高等法院法庭大廈

3/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 高等法院法庭大廈

地址 :

100, Taiwan, Taipei City, Zhongzheng District, 高等法院法庭大廈

分類:
城市 : Zhongzheng District

100, Taiwan, Taipei City, Zhongzheng District, 高等法院法庭大廈
R
Renyun Hsi. on Google

R
Roy Chen on Google

S
Simon Chung on Google

蔡清盛 on Google

L
L Xanxus on Google

博物館級美學奢華外觀
Museum-grade aesthetic luxury appearance
s
sepia on Google

民國57年興建之法庭大廈 (94年1月1日更名為刑事庭大廈)
The Court Building built in 1949 (renamed as the Criminal Court Building on January 1, 1994)
王珍家(Trancebonnie) on Google

記得看過的一份資料上面記載了政府各機關部會的預算,發現法院編列的預算是裡面最低的,這很讓人訝異,因為法院裡面的員工數量和場地使用率並不低於任何單位,法官開一天庭接觸的案件至少十二到十五件,不太了解他們一個人一個月會接觸的案件數量,但是一天十五件,二天就是三十件......,每個案件都是不同狀況,當事人,證人,關係人,證據.....,每個案件的人事時地物,光是記得每個案子裡的名字,地方,時間,就夠頭痛了,還要調查證據,還要處理判定各種專業技術的案件,很難明白為何法院獲得?爭取?的經費和預算卻很低,去開庭時只覺得這種狀況下每個法官或是當事人能夠分配到的支援和資源非常受限,付出的裁判費與法庭裡感受到的狀況,感覺有差距 無論如何,質與量很大的一部分來自經濟能力,法院是司法展現能力的一種方式,若是有更多經費,一定會更好,因為我真的是不懂,但是很有感∼個人觀感,抒發一下,要如何提升和如何爭取經費我不懂,只能對目前自己接觸到的資訊和參與的部份評論 有點費疑猜的是∼到底法官如何檢視證據?對於言詞辯論前後不一的說詞和爭議之處又是如何映證事實?雖然提出告訴,但是在法庭裡法感很少要求被告解釋我方所提證據,我們需要說明也少有回應,感覺原告與被告有點顛倒 更新:後來發現法院的整棟建築造價驚人,只能期望有高素質的軟硬體匹配 Ps.上法庭的個人經驗:無論告人還是被告,最重要的事情就是你在法庭上或是提告事件發生時,雙方協商過程中,幾乎是任何時間所說過,表達過與訴訟案件相關的言論,都可成為呈堂證供,及!只是證據,但是證據就要能讓人檢驗其真實性(要能提供檢驗證據的方法∼證人,證據短信,手機訊息),對造亦是如此,法官會參考證據和書狀判決,刑案檢察官會蒐證判定真偽,但民事案件就不知道誰來判定證據的真偽,大概當事人自行為之???畢竟民事案件是兩方對簿公堂,不像檢察官是代表人民去起訴被告,當事人自己要勤勞一點,原因是∼雙方意見不同之處,就是兩造爭點,沒有爭議的就是雙方都同意,那就算不爭的事實了!!!爭點是要查證的部份,若對方曾經有前後矛盾不一致的說法,記得請律師幫你們在法庭上提出,並確認有在法庭筆錄上被記錄下來,每次開庭之後要做爭點與雙方同意的事實整理筆記,這很重要!!!至於法庭筆錄內容是法官用來了解案情作為判決的主要工具,書記官在寫的時候要看仔細,有錯一定要立刻要求更正∼
I remember an information above to read the records of the organs of the government budget of ministries, the court found that budget allocation is the lowest of which, it plays like a surprise, because the inside of the court staff and space utilization rate is not lower than the number of any unit the judge opened court cases one day in contact with at least twelve to fifteen, do not know the number of cases they come into contact with a person a month, but the fifteen day, two days is thirty ...... each case the situation is different, parties, witnesses, human relations, the evidence ..... when personnel of each case feature, just remember that in each case the name of the place, time, enough headache, and also survey evidence, but also to deal with cases of various professional judgment, it is difficult to understand why the courts get? Fight? Funding and budget is very low, when to go to court just feel such a situation can be assigned to each judge or the parties to the support and resources are very limited, pay the fee and the referee felt the courtroom situation, I feel there is a gap In any case, a large part of the quality and quantity from the economic capacity, the Court of Justice is a way to show the ability, if there is more funding, will be better, because I really do not know, but it felt - my personal impression, express it, how to enhance and I do not know how to secure funding, currently only for their own access to information and participation in part comments Yi Cai fee is a little - in the end the judges how to view the evidence? For different before and after the oral arguments at the rhetoric and controversy is how bears out the fact? Although the proposed tell, but in the sense of Law courtroom rarely asked the defendant to explain our side of the evidence, we need to explain very few responded, feeling a little upside plaintiff and the defendant Updated: court later found the cost of the entire building amazing, can only expect to have high-quality software and hardware to match Ps personal experience on the court: Whether the defendant or the defendant, the most important thing is that you in court or sue the incident, the two sides in the negotiation process, almost any time have said, expressed associated with litigation speech, can become evidence in court, and! Just evidence, but the evidence is necessary to make people check their authenticity (to be able to provide evidence of the test method - witnesses, evidence text messages, phone messages), to build true, the judge will refer the evidence and pleadings, judgments, criminal cases prosecutors will determine the authenticity of the collection of evidence, but in civil cases do not know who is going to determine the authenticity of the evidence, the parties themselves about whom? ? ? After all civil cases are two parties in court, not the prosecutor is to prosecute the accused on behalf of the people, the parties themselves to a little hard work, because of different views of the two - at that point of contention by both sides, there is no dispute that both sides agree that even indisputable facts! ! ! Point of contention is to verify the part, if the other party had inconsistent conflicting statements, a lawyer to help you remember to put forward in court, and confirmed to be recorded in the court record, after each hearing with the parties do dispute the point agree with the fact that organize notes, it is very important! ! ! As for the court record content is used to judge about the case as the primary tool of the ruling, the Registry to look carefully at the time of writing, wrong must immediately demand a correction -
老師戴 on Google

今日臺灣高等法院的前身應追溯至日治時期,1895年日本取得台灣,其後不久開始著手將西方司法制度引入,台灣總督府於同年10月7日,以軍事命令發布「臺灣總督府法院職制」,設臺灣總督府法院一座於台北,並於台灣各地置支部共11個,然由於依該職制審判僅一審且為終審,因此臺灣總督府法院僅是台北地區的最高審判機關,並無高等法院之設。 台灣高等法院,簡稱高等法院、臺高院、高本院或高院,院本部位於臺灣臺北市中正區重慶南路一段,是中華民國的二級普通法院之一,組織上直屬司法院,審級上則以最高法院為上級審法院。
The predecessor of the Taiwan High Court today should be traced back to the Japanese occupation. In 1895, Japan acquired Taiwan. Soon after, it began to introduce the Western judicial system. On October 7, the Taiwan Governor’s Office issued a "Taiwan Governor’s Court Court System" with military orders. The Taiwan Governor’s Court is located in Taipei and has 11 branches in various parts of Taiwan. However, since the trial is based on the first instance and is the final trial, the Taiwan Governor’s Court is only the highest judicial organ in the Taipei area. The court's design. The Taiwan High Court, referred to as the High Court, the Taiwan High Court, the High Court or the High Court, is located in the section of Chongqing South Road, Zhongzheng District, Taipei, Taiwan. It is one of the second-class ordinary courts of the Republic of China, and is directly under the jurisdiction of the court. The upper court is the upper court.

Write some of your reviews for the company 高等法院法庭大廈

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *

Recommend a place for you