財團法人金融消費評議中心

I met a lady surnamed Shi and asked me to prepare information, but I went to call and ask for it, let me hit the wall, and kept repeating the case for a long time, I made it easy for you, I won’t play with me, I went crazy. Bar.

There is no gatekeeping mechanism, all cases are accepted, and a bunch of Australians have been raised. Now the law can be lost. As long as it is said that it is going to be reviewed, the impossible will become possible.

I complained to a broker, but my salesperson did not make any mistakes at all. Why is your fine passed on to my salesperson?

It is suggested that the reply letter of the review center should name the conclusions made by the reviewers, so as to show responsibility and approval. Otherwise, the reply letter should not be responsible.

Regarding the personal encounters (Mr. Guo and Mr. Yang), the service attitude is very good, and they will provide valuable advice when they have related questions. In particular, Mr. Yang has a warm heart. He provides pros and cons analysis from multiple perspectives, and handles it with a heart-to-heart attitude, so that the applicant can get the best way to deal with it. thank you very much!

A good unit to assist in handling insurance disputes with many enthusiastic and professional staff. Before appealing, you must first collect favorable evidence to avoid surprises. This is very difficult when the insurance company has all favorable conditions. Appealing to this unit is not the last stop. If there is a grievance, it is recommended to call the police directly and go to the court to verify the handwriting, which will be more direct. The complainant must take a firm stand and do not sign the reconciliation letter casually, and mediation is almost useless because the insurance company will not back down. But no matter how good the unit is, there will still be rat shit, so pay attention to the questioning in the conversation. If you don't trust each other with the window, change the undertaker. The Mr. Li and Ms. Shi that I have met will ask some sensitive topics during the conversation. You should pay special attention to it, and you will obviously feel that you are partial to one side, and you will be softly "persuaded to quit", so that you cannot go to the evaluation stage. Please appeal. People pay more attention. PS. In the process of mediation, try to strive for face-to-face, otherwise it is easy to be rhetorical... But it is recommended to directly discuss or the court