龐波國際法律事務所(衡陽所) - Zhongzheng District
4/5
★
基於 4 評論
Contact 龐波國際法律事務所(衡陽所)
地址 : | 10045, Taiwan, Taipei City, Zhongzheng District, Hengyang Rd, 51號龐波國際法律事務所(衡陽所)6樓 |
電話 : | 📞 +8889 |
網站 : | http://www.wglaw.com.tw/ |
分類: | |
城市 : | Hengyang Rd |
楊
|
楊燕玲 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
夏
|
夏捷 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
J
|
June Bascio on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
E
|
Elvis Wu on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2020年去面試,當時面試者是許惠峰律師和鍾佩陵律師(後者不確定),因為我對於他們勞動契約要綁約兩年還三年提出詢問,它們就態度丕變,還不停跳針說:「勞基法有規定嗎?哪一條?你說說看啊。」
我真的很傻眼,勞動基準法第15條之1規定:「未符合下列規定之一,雇主不得與勞工為最低服務年限之約定: 一、雇主為勞工進行專業技術培訓,並提供該項培訓費用者。 二、雇主為使勞工遵守最低服務年限之約定,提供其合理補償者。 前項最低服務年限之約定,應就下列事項綜合考量,不得逾合理範圍: 一、雇主為勞工進行專業技術培訓之期間及成本。 二、從事相同或類似職務之勞工,其人力替補可能性。 三、雇主提供勞工補償之額度及範圍。 四、其他影響最低服務年限合理性之事項。 違反前二項規定者,其約定無效。 勞動契約因不可歸責於勞工之事由而於最低服務年限屆滿前終止者,勞工不負違反最低服務年限約定或返還訓練費用之責任。」他們在面試時回答不出來他們提供什麼專業技術培訓費用、或者有提供合理補償,更不要說連2015年增修的條文都不知道。
身為主持律師卻欠缺如此專業,我當下決定不要去這家工作了,不然不僅要我接受過時的見解指令,勞基法規定的最低勞動條件的標準,這家也不知道還能符合多少。
I went for an interview in 2020. At the time, the interviewees were Attorney Xu Huifeng and Attorney Zhong Peiling (the latter is not sure). Because I asked about their labor contract for two years and three years, their attitudes changed, and they kept jumping and saying: "Is there any regulation in the Labor Law? Which one? Tell me about it."
I am really dumbfounded. Article 15-1 of the Labor Standards Law stipulates: "If one of the following requirements is not met, the employer shall not agree with the worker for the minimum service period: 1. The employer shall provide professional technical training for the worker and provide such training 2. The employer provides reasonable compensation for the worker to comply with the minimum service period. The minimum service period specified in the preceding paragraph shall be comprehensively considered in the following matters and shall not exceed the reasonable scope: 1. The employer shall provide professional technical training for the worker 2. The possibility of manpower replacement for workers engaged in the same or similar duties. 3. The amount and scope of labor compensation provided by the employer. 4. Other matters that affect the reasonableness of the minimum service period. Violation of the preceding two provisions , The agreement is invalid. If the labor contract is terminated before the expiration of the minimum service period for reasons that are not attributable to the worker, the worker shall not be liable for breaching the minimum service period agreement or refunding the training fee." They could not answer during the interview. They provided What kind of professional and technical training costs, or provide reasonable compensation, not to mention that you don’t even know the provisions of 2015.
As the presiding attorney who lacks such a professionalism, I decided not to work at this place, or I will not only be required to accept outdated opinions and instructions, but also the minimum labor conditions stipulated by the Labor Standards Law.
|
Write some of your reviews for the company 龐波國際法律事務所(衡陽所)
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you