新光產物保險股份有限公司台北總公司 - Section 2

A company that can't afford to lose I just want to win, but I don’t want to take responsibility and not admit defeat?????

A property insurance company with good service efficiency, fast claims settlement, novel products, and kindly responsible for the promotion.

Too shrimp, the insurance policy is the same as Fubon After seeing the serious epidemic situation, one by one refunded the insurance Shrimp through And just got long term insurance. really want to give up

The premiums are more expensive than other companies, and it is difficult for the insured to delay the claim settlement, unprofessional, poor service, and the worst insurance company I have ever encountered. I sincerely advise everyone not to insure Xinguang.

bad enough attitude always shirk responsibility When the compulsory insurance expires, I have to pay a fine of 3,000 yuan I haven't received the letter at home and I don't know how this is handled! And we're going to blame the dealership that bought the car

To Shin Kong Insurance~ There are several questions I would like to ask your company: 1. The vehicle collided on May 6, 109, and it did not enter the factory until May 12 for valuation. Is it reasonable? What if there is a new injury during the week? 2. If there is a dispute between the two parties about the damaged part of the vehicle, should the police record be the mainstay? 3. On June 5, 109, your unit notified the vehicle to be repaired by a text message. I immediately called and asked to go to the maintenance factory to check the damage of the vehicle. Your unit asked me to see it myself! Is it reasonable? 4. When I called your company and raised objections to negotiate on the responsibility, the parts of the car damage and the amount of repairs, your company's undertaker actually hung up on me! is this correct? 5. In the whole process of incident handling, your unit almost always informs you by text message. Is it reasonable? It was not until the middle of 110 that I sent a document to close the case. After I received it, I immediately called to ask: The two sides have not reached an agreement, how to close the case? Your unit replied: It has been handed over to the legal department for processing! 6. In September 2011, I received the court's civil compensation and mediation document; I immediately called the legal undertaker of your unit to coordinate, hoping to reach a consensus and avoid wasting judicial resources, but your unit still insists on paying full compensation with your estimate! Is this reasonable? 7. The court held a preparatory court on January 20, 111, requiring your unit to reinforce the evidence of the accident within two weeks, and held a debate court on March 10. Your unit sent the Chen report to the court on February 8, but did not send the Chen report to me until March 8. I received the Chen report on March 14, which resulted in my filing on March 10. The debate court, unable to prepare relevant defense materials! A big company that is listed and listed on the OTC market should use this kind of calculation method to deal with a common man who can't afford a lawyer, right? 8. The court asked your unit to reinforce the evidence of the accident; your unit even explained to the judge that I accepted the fact that there was a collision with the attitude of me actively trying to solve the matter! Reports like yours may be legal, but are they reasonable? Do you want to make it clear to the world that in the future, you will discuss damages with your unit, and do not take the initiative to negotiate compensation? Otherwise, your unit will be used as the evidence submitted to the court! The above is the process of coordinating the damage compensation case between me and your company. If your company claims to be a big company? Please do not delete the article; let us accept the public comment together!