中華民國勞資關係協進會 - Taipei City

The mediator lacks patience, lacks knowledge of laws and regulations, and lacks the ability and willingness to guide the labor and capital to achieve a balance, making the mediation a market-like bidding. It is meaningless to come here for mediation.

Thank you Mr. Xiao, the mediator, who patiently assisted both parties in completing the labor dispute. It is recommended that both parties in dispute must prepare complete evidence before departure in order to speed up the mediation process. Only the mediator can assist in the specific content of the request.

If there is a labor dispute, a third party is needed to preside over it. However, the mediation committee member Huang Xue listens to the management. We want to refute the management. Huang Xue also said: Now the labor has no right to speak, and now she is the moderator. , or go elsewhere to apply for mediation. If there is no problem with the management, there will be disputes that need to be mediated. Do you think everyone loves it? ? A third party who is not neutral will harm the workers a second time, and a committee member who is totally incompetent will only have empathy if he has a dispute that needs to be mediated one day when the committee member is replaced.

This is the first time I really confronted my former employer. The mediation meeting was supposed to be held in 2021/12, but the former employer did not show up for the meeting. Later, they proposed this mediation meeting because they were fined by the government. But Mr. Lai, the mediator who attended this time, handled the situation quite unfairly. Whether it was right or wrong, it was obvious from his attitude that he was one-sided towards the management and helped the management! Can't tell right from wrong at all! Suddenly, I read everyone's comments. Sure enough, we are all disaster victims with the surname of Lai Abei. When delivering the documentary evidence, he rudely gave my information to the former employer, and even agreed without asking my opinion to let the employer. Reprinting my information, I am directly opposed to it at the moment! There is my personal information in the information. If my personal safety is in danger, who will be responsible? (I have been intimidated by private words!) And the documents that the employer wanted to give me, I asked now if I can remake it? The mediator surnamed Lai directly refused for the management and said no! Is this how you should be so cautious? It is very dangerous that we have sufficient evidence, who is right or wrong for all to see, and the evidence speaks! But in fact, there are still good people in the office, and the colleagues in the office understand the situation and help me! The attitude is also very friendly and friendly, but it is a pity that Mr. Lai handled the process improperly, and I had such an unfair experience in the first head-to-head confrontation. I really feel that he is very unworthy of this position! If you meet him, everyone should be mentally prepared, such a person please don't hurt us, the poor laborers who have already suffered a lot.

What can a "unit" with "name but no (public power) rights" do for laborers? It's just to let the laborers who filed (appeal) go in vain.

Male mediators are just typing civil servants. Although they claim to have ten years of mediation experience, they have no interest in mediation, no warmth, and do not fight for the rights of the aggrieved laborers! I just want to quickly type and close the case. If there is a KPI for closing the case, I am really worried for the taxpayers. It turns out that money is wasted like this! Even the mediation committee suggested me to sue directly. Excuse me, why should I mediate? ! Just sue the court for a ruling, why waste everyone's time? I thought that there would be a result of the mediation, but I really felt that it was a waste of time!