致正國際法律事務所 - Section 2

4.7/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 致正國際法律事務所

地址 :

106, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Section 2, Jinshan S Rd, 12號五樓之五致正國際法律事務所

電話 : 📞 +8887
網站 : http://www.chief-justice.com.tw/
分類:
城市 : Jinshan S Rd

106, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Section 2, Jinshan S Rd, 12號五樓之五致正國際法律事務所
T
Thera Chen on Google

服務親切,不厭其煩的幫我做諮詢,超感謝!
The service is kind and I am tired of helping me with the consultation. Thank you very much!
S
Sarah Yeh on Google

服務親切,講解簡單扼要,對於不清楚法律條文的人也很適合
The service is friendly, brief explanation, for people who do not know the law is also very suitable
姚巧雯 on Google

陳家婕法務很親切,諮詢案件處理非常細心專業!讚~非常感謝
Chen Jiaxuan's legal affairs are very cordial, and the handling of the case is very careful and professional! Thank you very much~
薩西米 on Google

線上Line 諮詢講解很耐心詳細,感謝陳法務在節日期間一樣為我服務解答。感恩~
The online Line consultation was very patient and detailed. Thanks to Chen Fawu for the same service during the festival. Thanks ~
D
Demon mini (mD) on Google

從免費諮詢開始,一切的服務都非常為我們著想,也很願意讓我們詢問,以及討論案件的狀況,專業程度、服務態度都讓我們感到非常的放心。 價格也非常為當事人狀況著想,謝謝律師及各個服務人員的幫忙。
Starting from the free consultation, all the services are very considerate for us, and we are very willing to let us ask, and discuss the status of the case, professionalism and service attitude make us feel very relieved. The price is also very much for the situation of the parties, thank you lawyers and various service staff for their help.
L
Lin Ling on Google

推薦蕭律師,邏輯論述清楚,法學涵養豐富,設身處地為受害者著想,不可多得的好律師。
Recommend Lawyer Xiao. The logic is clear, the law is rich in culture, and the victim is a good lawyer.
簡書 on Google

一、我是當事人黃先生,事情發生是在108年2月,這是真人真事,我委任周律師撰寫恐嚇罪告訴狀等5個案由,該所明明有收費恐嚇案由費用,總共收費3萬元整,竟謊稱沒有收費恐嚇罪案由,事後周律師答應寫上,結果周律師卻故意寫「要脅」,且誘騙當事人稱妨礙秘密罪調查證據是寫恐嚇罪告訴,該書狀內容都未寫心裡畏懼部分,未獨立寫一份正式恐嚇罪犯罪事實,周律師趁當事人不懂法律之際,誤導錯誤的訟訴程序多次,說...「要先請檢方調取證據,這樣你才能提告」,意圖矇騙當事人正確訴訟程序,該周律師意圖圖利對造?為何堅持不寫?導致恐嚇罪未偵辦,影響檢方對被告犯罪自由心証,也造成恐嚇證據因時間遭滅失,該所不但不敢提供當時委任會議錄音檔,全程周律師都未出面解決,致正周律師「隱匿」當事人一個最重要案由,間接影響當事人提告案情全不起訴處分,皆由因果關係,本人向律師公會提出申訴,希望能將周律師移送懲戒委員會,並提出刑事告訴背信罪。 二、經發現周律師未寫恐嚇罪告訴時,該所既然無補救措施,繼續欺騙當事人錯誤訴訟程序,罔顧當事人的委任權益,請各位消費者,你要注意這一家致正事務所,建議在委任全程錄音保存證據,這是我個人親身經驗,不希望在有受害者,周弘洛律師害我一輩子恐嚇陰影,無法伸張正義,周律師處理態度傲慢欺誘,到法庭上公布委任會議錄音檔,皆可真相大白。若懲處成功,未來在法務部網站上皆可查詢律師違反事蹟,讓消費民眾公開查詢,以免找到不良的律師。 三、在處理違失的過程中,遭該陳法助言語侮辱,他說「那有人像你怎麼可笑的,那麼閒...」。 四、該所律師違反律師法,矇騙當事人及不正當行為等,屬重大情節,得移送懲戒委員會。以昭公信 我委任周弘洛律師寫告訴書狀,這件事是真實事實於公共利益有關,可受公評於評論。 備註:因為我原本評論似乎被業主隱藏,因此我用另一個帳號評論,希望消費者能注意委任律師的自身權益,如您跟我一樣受到類似情況,請您為這篇評論按讚,讓消費者知道狀況,我已經是受害,不願意在有人受害。
1. I am Mr. Huang. The incident happened in February 108. This is a real person. I appointed Lawyer Zhou to write a statement of intimidation, including 5 cases. There is a fee for the intimidation case. The total fee is 30,000. Yuanzheng lied that there was no charge for intimidation crimes. Afterwards, lawyer Zhou promised to write, but in the end, lawyer Zhou deliberately wrote "to threaten", and tricked the client into saying that obstructing the investigation of secret crimes was to write evidence of intimidation. He did not write the fear in his heart, and did not independently write a formal crime of intimidation. Attorney Zhou misled the wrong litigation process many times while the client did not understand the law, saying... "Please first ask the prosecutor for evidence, Only then can you file a complaint", intending to defraud the parties of the correct litigation procedure, which Zhou's lawyer intends to profit from? Why not insist on writing? The crime of intimidation was not investigated, which affected the prosecution’s testimony of the defendant’s criminal freedom, and also caused the intimidation evidence to be lost due to time. The institute not only dared not provide the recording of the appointed meeting at that time, but lawyer Zhou throughout the whole process did not come forward to solve it. One of the most important reasons for the client, which indirectly affects the client's case of not prosecuting the case, is caused by cause and effect. I filed a complaint with the Law Society, hoping to transfer Mr. Zhou to the Disciplinary Committee and file a criminal telling offense. 2. When it was discovered that Lawyer Zhou did not write the intimidation report, the institute continued to deceive the parties in the wrong litigation process, ignoring the parties’ rights of appointment, since there is no remedy, please consumers, you should pay attention to this Zhizheng firm. It is my personal experience to appoint the entire recording to save the evidence. I don’t want to have a victim. Attorney Zhou Hongluo has threatened me with a lifelong threat of intimidation and can’t express justice. Attorney Zhou handles the arrogant deception and publishes the recording of the appointment meeting in court. All can tell the truth. If the punishment is successful, the lawyer’s violations can be checked on the website of the Legal Department in the future, so that consumers can make public enquiries to avoid finding bad lawyers. 3. In the process of dealing with the violation, he was insulted by Chen Fazhu's speech. He said, "That person is so ridiculous, so idle..." 4. The lawyers of the firm violated the Law of the Attorney, deceived the client and improperly act, etc., which is a serious case and may be transferred to the disciplinary committee. Zhao Gongxin I appointed attorney Zhou Hongluo to write a written statement that this matter is related to the public interest and can be commented on by the public. Remarks: Because my original comment seems to be hidden by the owner, I use another account to comment. I hope consumers can pay attention to the self-interest of the appointed lawyer. If you are similar to me, please like this comment and let the consumer The person knows the situation, I am already victimized and do not want to be victimized.
C
Cheresa Phu on Google

Affordable price with professional service. Thank you so much.

Write some of your reviews for the company 致正國際法律事務所

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *