中華民國品質學會

3.9/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 中華民國品質學會

地址 :

10646, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Section 2, Roosevelt Rd, 75號中華民國品質學會

電話 : 📞 +88
網站 : http://www.csq.org.tw/
分類:
城市 : Roosevelt Rd

10646, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Section 2, Roosevelt Rd, 75號中華民國品質學會
蕭瑞昌 on Google

林澤翰 on Google

星星S on Google

范琝瀚 on Google

a
anthony7510232007 on Google

很棒!
Great!
黃振剛 on Google

很好
very good
蔡欣如 on Google

品質會友充電的窩,不只滿足腦袋瓜,亦可互相安慰加油打氣,如果你也是品質人記得回家學習呦。
The rechargeable nest of quality club friends not only satisfies the brain, but also comforts and cheers each other. If you are also a quality person, remember to go home and study.
M
Molly on Google

身為品質學會卻擁有不怎麼好的態度和做事品質,1.在學會上課,午餐由學會負責,事前會先確認葷素食,但當天忘記也就算了(畢竟只有我吃素,能理解第一天不小心被忘記),告知學會員工時,該員工第一時間不是去確認調查表或午餐統計而是直接質疑我根本沒告訴他們,且態度相當差也不聽我建議查閱資料,後來是位有年紀的員工出面確認是他們作業疏失導致,還我清白。 2.上課期間,若有問題可發信詢問,但事實上發完信後,你要是沒有打電話,他們不太會回信。 3.證書上羅馬拼音拼錯,且不是個案,電話告知時(又是上述1.2.同一位人員)口氣差,不知道的還以為是我自己的錯,最後讓我把證書寄回去。 4.老師教學品質和教材參疵不齊,每個人感受不同,詳情可多多詢問有上過學會和外面補習班的朋友或網友。 5.一樣的學費,其他補習班提供課本內容是精簡過字大又有空間做筆記且還有膠裝和封面,學會是複印老師ppt講義,字小又沒筆記空間,印刷字還會剝落,手或橡皮擦一不小心就會造成字體損壞,重點是許多內容老師直接略過不講,寧可把時間花在自己的世界在講臺研究解題,或是純唸課文,就是不和學生互動,確認學習狀況。 建議:請學會省去免費的午餐,把午餐費拿去提升教材品質,至於老師品質,請學會認真找並過濾會教的老師,而不要為了人情而忽略學生學習權益和需求,最後,請內審考慮教育訓練內部工作人員。 2顆星是給予課程上唯一教的最好的基統老師,教學上深入淺出,不時和學生互動以確認學習狀況,請學會好好珍惜這位老師?
As a quality institute, I have a not-so-good attitude and quality of work. 1. During the class, the institute is responsible for lunch. I will confirm the meat and vegetarian food beforehand, but forget it on the day. (After all, only I am a vegetarian and can understand the first day. Accidentally forgotten), when I told the staff of the society, the staff did not check the questionnaire or the lunch statistics at the first time, but directly questioned that I didn’t tell them at all, and the attitude was quite bad and did not listen to my suggestion to check the information. The older employees came forward to confirm that it was their homework negligence, and I was innocent. 2. During the class, if you have any questions, you can send a letter to ask, but in fact, after sending the letter, if you do not call, they will not reply. 3. The Roman pinyin spelling on the certificate is wrong, and it is not a case. When I called (the same person in 1.2. above), the tone was bad. Those who didn’t know it thought it was my own fault, and finally asked me to send the certificate back. 4. Teachers' teaching quality and teaching materials are inconsistent, and everyone feels different. For details, you can ask friends or netizens who have attended the school and external cram schools. 5. The same tuition fees, other cram schools provide textbooks that are simplified and large, with space for taking notes, as well as plastic binding and cover. Learning is to copy the teacher's ppt handout, the words are small and there is no space for notes, and the printed words will peel off. Accidental hand or eraser will cause font damage. The point is that many content teachers simply ignore it and don’t talk about it. They would rather spend time in their own world, studying and solving problems on the podium, or just reading the text, that is, not interacting with students, confirm learning status. Suggestion: Please learn to save the free lunch, and use the lunch fee to improve the quality of teaching materials. As for the quality of teachers, please learn to carefully find and filter teachers who can teach, instead of ignoring students' learning rights and needs for the sake of humanity. Finally, please Review to consider educating and training internal staff. 2 stars is given to the best basic teacher who teaches in the course. The teaching is profound in simple language. Interact with students from time to time to confirm the learning status. Please learn to cherish this teacher ?

Write some of your reviews for the company 中華民國品質學會

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *

Recommend a place for you