風傳媒 - Lane 513

I really like off-get off work economics~ Come on~

Quite unprofessional media company. Reports do not need to be verified.

Very attentive media, although the current results have not been presented to the public, I believe that there will be a dazzling performance in the future

Fake news is flooded, ptt dcard copy of the net text becomes news without confirmation or extended coverage. Your reporter is really good to be

Simply comment on reports produced by this media company. I do n’t know if it ’s a superior, no matter what the reporter reported, I still do n’t know what my reporter is doing? As a media but not at all neutral and objective, the words and sentences show the reporter's personal experience of a report. I graduated from the relevant media department. When I read the news, I read all the reports. I feel that Feng Media is the least ok news media at present. See, the position of not discussing the news is different from mine. I think this is a very unprofessional news report. The people do not want to see the reporter's experience. The people only need to report openly, fairly and transparently, and don't add comments to mislead people to watch the news.

Time to unite Don't split or pull your hind legs It doesn't matter if you don't know how to be grateful Don't be self-righteous People who criticize the first-line efforts indiscriminately

A closer look will reveal that this media is really very different from traditional media thinking. In fact, he is more neutral than any other media, and he will have articles from different angles on one thing. However, the general Taiwanese media will use an article to make him seem to talk about two aspects, but in fact he is biased towards one aspect. If you study Feng Media’s articles carefully, you will find that they will not conceal the fact that this article is about A or B. If you want to talk about it, I will analyze it in depth. The following extended reading will then be taken to other articles. I appreciate this approach. It is impossible for the author not to have his own ideology. Instead of making a bunch of false and neutral reports, it is better to let people from all standpoints report objectively, and then gather them into a multi-faceted collection. I really recommend people who are interested in media research to take a closer look. Don't read a few articles and use traditional thinking to draw conclusions. It's a pity. What they suffer is that it is a media that runs too far ahead, which will make it unacceptable to some traditional people. Paper thinking is that everything must be presented in the same article because of space limitations. But in the Internet age, you can use multiple articles to explain it clearly.