皇家翡翠大廈管理委員會 - Anle District

3.6/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 皇家翡翠大廈管理委員會

地址 :

204, Taiwan, Keelung City, Anle District, Maijin Rd, 781號皇家翡翠大廈管理委員會

電話 : 📞 +8887
分類:
城市 : Maijin Rd

204, Taiwan, Keelung City, Anle District, Maijin Rd, 781號皇家翡翠大廈管理委員會
莊文輝先生 on Google

有夠讚.安一路有去
There is enough. An all the way to go
麗貞林 on Google

糟糕又沒制度的管委會管理
Bad and unregulated management committee management
黃鼎富 on Google

公車站牌沒有燈 讓人晚上看不清楚
There is no light on the bus stop sign, so people can’t see clearly at night
林采穎 on Google

108年11月17日一日遊,沒有表決也沒有過問全社區住戶就自行決定一日遊,扣掉公所和里長贊助還花了所有住戶繳交的管理費NT26860,300多戶住戶只有66戶參加,卻要全住戶買單,管委會和聯邦保全的總幹事根本是黑箱作業,非住戶竟然也可以參加只要交800塊!!! 66位住戶+16位非住戶=82個人參加,總花費93760/82人=一個人花費1143,非住戶到底為何可以只交800塊,濫用社區大多數人繳交的管理費,給少數人旅遊,竟還有非住戶,實在是太可惡的管委會和聯邦保全總幹事!!!!!!!!! 管理不善,委外的聯邦保全警衛很糟糕,車道的警衛常打嗑睡或上網, 車道警衛1天只會出來站崗2個小時,早上7點到8點,晚上6點到7點,現在規定車道警衛已經不能指揮,形同虛設,實在不必浪費錢請車道警衛,完全沒有功能,站2小時毫無作用,請來是做什麼的??!! 警衛素質差,管委會沒有定期讓外面好的保全公司來招標,萬年不變的綁樁保全公司
On the day of November 17, 108, there was no vote or question. The residents of the whole community decided to take a day trip. The deduction of the office and the sponsorship of the lieutenant also cost all the households to pay the management fee NT26860. More than 300 households only had 66. If the household participates, but the whole household must pay the bill, the director of the management committee and the federal security is simply a black box operation, and the non-residents can even participate in the delivery of only 800 pieces! ! ! 66 households + 16 non-residents = 82 people participated, the total cost is 93760/82 people = one person spends 1143, why can non-residents pay only 800 yuan, abuse the management fees paid by most people in the community, and travel to a few people, There are still non-residents, it is really too abominable management committee and the Federal Security Director-General!!!!!!!!! Poor management, out-of-town federal security guards are very bad, lane guards often doze off or go online. Lane guards will only stand out for 2 hours in a day, 7 am to 8 am, and 6 pm to 7 pm. Now the lane guards are no longer able to command, and they are ineffective. You don't have to waste money to ask for lane guards. There is no function at all. Station 2 Hours have no effect, what do you do? ? ! ! The quality of the guards is poor, the management committee does not regularly let the good security companies outside to bid, and the company has not kept the company for ten years.
獨身健力仔 on Google

送餐到這裡 客氣詢問保全 結果直接被吼 原來做保全也可以做出優越感欸 都是出來工作的 有必要態度這麼差?
Delivery here Politely ask about security The result was directly yelled at It turns out that doing security can also make a sense of superiority They all came out to work. Need to have such a bad attitude?
P
Peach little on Google

(((車位根本很難抽,抽的到根本是幸運,抽不到就再等半年才能停, 管委會自已決定每位管委有B4車位可以停,根本是在自肥, 完全沒問過全體住戶的意見,實在是有夠爛的管委會))) 沒過問全體住戶表決是否要舉辦一日遊,就私自決定舉辦, 皇家翡翠((總戶數331戶)),「總參加人數才「70人」, 參加1/4的戶數都不到,零零總總花費NT78,908, (還花錢買母親節蛋糕和高梁!!!!????)→實在是太扯, 有((議員補助)),社區大家繳的管理費還要幫忙支付NT12,908, 幫這些少數的住戶支付旅遊款, 管委會和聯邦保全的總幹事,完全罔顧住戶權益
(((It’s hard to get a parking space at all. It’s lucky if you get it. If you don’t get it, you can wait another half a year to stop. The management committee has decided that each management committee has a B4 parking space to park, which is basically self-fertilizing. I haven't asked all the residents for their opinions at all, there is really a bad enough management committee))) Without asking all residents to vote whether to organize a day trip, they decided to organize it privately. Royal Jade ((the total number of households is 331)), "the total number of participants is only "70 people", Participating in a quarter of the households is less than the total cost of NT78,908, (I also spent money to buy cakes and sorghum for Mother's Day!!!!????) → It's too much, Yes ((member subsidy)), the management fee paid by everyone in the community will also help pay NT12,908, To help these few residents pay for travel, The Director General of the Management Committee and Federal Security, completely disregarding the rights of households
蔡逸軒 on Google

停車方便,就是要抽籤麻煩了點,幾乎都可以抽到車位,沒抽到也能跟抽到的住戶承租。 擔任管委會人員能直接停B4, 真的超好
Parking is convenient. It’s a little troublesome to draw lots. Almost all parking spaces can be drawn. If you don’t get it, you can rent it with the tenants. Serving as a member of the management committee can directly stop B4, which is really super good
w
wecare Hi on Google

1.管委會做決定,都不會問過全體住戶的意見,只以少數住戶的意見為意見就決定事情,不使用全體投票表決的方法,即使是住戶大會也沒有全體住戶參加,草草以舉手投票表決,隨便幾個人投票就決定事情,毫無公信力可言。 2.大樓位於出入車輛繁多的交通要道,車道警衛一天只指揮2次,1次1小時,一天就才2小時,有些警衛其他時間都在打盹,真正有在看進出車輛的只有2個警衛,大部份時間有車道警衛跟沒有一樣,進出沒在控管,不如設置匝欄不需警衛,還可以省下大筆的費用,不用調漲管理費。 3.管委會一邊說設區經費不夠考慮調漲管理費,但一邊又以只有少數居民意見,就私自辦理新春晚會,支出近4萬元,參加戶數根本不到社區的一半,浪費所有住戶繳交的管理費,再來說經費不夠要漲管理費。 4.一樣完全沒調查過所有住戶的意見,就私自決定每年都要辦理「年度晚會」和「年度旅遊」,浪費住戶繳交的管理費,讓少數人參加活動,實在太不合理。 5.反應任何事情,花錢請來的總幹事總有理由推托或搓湯圓,反應的事跟沒反應一樣石沈大海,很多住戶是敢怒不敢言。 6.車位是用抽籤的方式,一樣沒經過全體住戶的同意,就自行開會決議讓管委會的所有委員可以不用抽籤停地下B4,停對面世紀停車場的住戶,竟然也算有抽到車位,這期沒抽到但有停對面下期就不能優先選位,太過於不合理。 7.大樓一樓門戶全開,每棟樓永遠都是開著,住戶也沒有鑰匙,所以門也不能關起來,反應過後也沒用,只得到「因大家習慣門不關了」令人傻眼。
1. The management committee will not ask the opinions of all the households when making a decision. Only the opinions of a few households will be used to decide things. Without the method of voting by the whole, even if the household meeting is not attended by all the households, it will be taken carelessly. Raise your hand to vote, just a few people vote to decide things, there is no credibility at all. 2. The building is located in a traffic lane with a lot of traffic, and the lane guards only command 2 times a day, 1 hour per time, and only 2 hours a day. Some guards are dozing at other times, and there are only 2 guards watching the entry and exit vehicles. Most of the time, there are lane guards that are not like that. In and out are not under control. It is better to set up a ramp without guards. You can also save a lot of money and do not need to increase the management fee. 3. While the management committee said that the funding for setting up the district was not enough to consider raising the management fee, but on the other hand, with the opinions of a few residents, they handled the New Year party privately, spending nearly 40,000 yuan, and the number of participating households was less than half of the community, wasting all The management fee paid by the household, and then the management fee is increased if the funds are not enough. 4. I did not investigate the opinions of all the households at all, so I decided to handle the "annual party" and "annual tour" every year privately, wasting management fees paid by the households and letting a small number of people participate in activities, which is too unreasonable. 5. Responding to anything, the Director General invited to spend money has a reason to dodge or rub the dumplings. The reaction is as heavy as the failure to respond. Many residents dare to speak out. 6. The parking spaces are drawn by lot. Similarly, without the consent of all the residents, they decided to meet on their own to allow all members of the management committee to park underground B4 without drawing lots. It is too unreasonable not to be selected in this issue but there will be no priority in the next period. 7. The portal on the first floor of the building is fully open, each building is always open, and the residents do not have keys, so the doors cannot be closed, and they are useless after the reaction. It is dumbfounded to only get "Because everyone is used to the door is not closed".

Write some of your reviews for the company 皇家翡翠大廈管理委員會

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *

Recommend a place for you