吳弘鵬律師事務所

Advise the appointor seeking to appoint a lawyer -------------------------------------------------- --------------- 1. Called a week ago to make an appointment to discuss the case with a lawyer before the appointment. The appointment time is 2 pm on a working day. 2. Arranged to receive a call from the director at noon on the same day. I said that I was asked to change to 1 pm due to the lawyer's time. I also agreed to go to the appointment immediately. I will wait in time to enter the room and wait for the basic tea to be heard on the same day. No, waiting an hour later, that is, the original appointment time of 2 o'clock, another person who claimed to be Lin lawyer and I consulted (not Wu Hongpeng lawyer), Lin did not give him his business card. 3. The next morning, I received a call from the firm’s man, saying that Wu Hongpeng’s lawyer would like to invite himself to the office to interview the case and agree to 11 am the next day. 4. Arranged at 9:00 on the morning of the same day, I received a call from the director of the firm to indicate that the appointment time should be postponed until 12 noon. I will wait in the room for another hour without water, and at 1 o'clock, the director will give me the opportunity. Said that the interview with Wu Hongpeng lawyers should be extended until 4:30 pm on the same day, and said that the original appointment of 12 noon was not included in Wu’s itinerary. I am going to the director of the institute to confirm the fourth time at 4:30 to interview Wu Hongpeng. Leave 5. At about 1:30 pm on the same day, the self-proclaimed lawyer Lin said that Wu Hongpeng’s lawyer had cancelled the case of "obligation free" at 4:30 pm on the same day because he had no mutual trust. 6. At 2 o'clock in the afternoon, I received a newsletter claiming to be the office. The following original excerpt - here is Wu Hongpeng's office, reminding you that if you have false statements or accusations against the firm, you have been involved in criminal insults and insults. The Institute will tell in accordance with the law, and Wang Jun will be self-respecting. 7. I have booked a free consultation office that has not met the time of the day. 8. I have booked a free consultation office that has not met the water and let the party wait for an hour. It starts within 5 minutes. 9. I have made an appointment for a free consultation office. I have not seen the lawyer before I have been interviewed and said that I want to appoint a appointee. 10. I didn’t even wait for an hour, the director of the office told the client that your appointment was not included in the itinerary.

I learned a lot of case-handling experience during the five-month internship here, and also cultivated the ability to write pleadings from scratch. In the process of attending the court, Lawyer Wu's uncluttered and well-organized court hearing skills are deeply admirable. Thank you lawyer for letting me experience the spirit of never giving up and striving for the rights and interests of the client.

Maybe someone can't get the help they want from a lawyer (such as an innocence verdict, commutation of sentence, etc.), but because of the efforts of Lawyer Wu and his team members, I feel that my judicial decision is promising.

I very much regret appointing Wu Hongpeng Law Firm to handle the appointment affairs! I am very disappointed with the quality of services provided by the firm! Today I finally saw how the law firm bullied its clients! It was really eye-opening and chilling to the parties! The service quality of the firm can only be described as a deserted voice! I very much regret appointing the firm! I will appeal the firm to the Law Society! The firm is welcome to sue me, and I must counterclaim the firm's false accusation! For this firm maliciously distorted the facts and vilified me, I will also retain the right of legal prosecution and resort to the media to face it up!

The firm is under the leadership of Lawyer Wu Hongpeng. Every lawyer and team member is friendly and professional. My family and I have appointed Wu Hongpeng Law Firm for more than a dozen civil criminal cases. With rich experience, professionalism and good service attitude, the appointing person can be assured and worthwhile. recommend

Recently, there was a small problem that needed to be consulted, but it was not big enough to be entrusted, but there were some doubts about the contract, so I searched the Internet and saw that this lawyer offers free services for the first consultation, so I called Appointed on the phone. The lady who answered the phone spoke very clearly about the way of consultation, and agreed on the time as soon as possible. To be honest, the first time I went to the law firm to discuss things, it was really nervous. We have prepared and prepared the materials. , I also prepared the questions, so as not to talk too much nonsense, waste time, and miss the point. Before the lawyer came, we met the lawyer's cat, a very clingy white cat! so cute! Let's not be nervous anymore~ I feel as a whole that this lawyer spoke very clearly. There was no nonsense during the whole process. He asked what to answer and what to answer. Although he saw this contract for the first time, we did not provide it in advance, but he felt that his mind was very clear. Even the part doesn’t have to be said many times, he can understand it once and he can also give us advice. In short, the consultation experience this time is great! Remarks: I am not an industry partner, and I didn't take advantage of them, just pure information...

specialized! ! Cough, cough, cough, cough, cough, cough, he's bleeding. Those who need it suggest that you should not rush to hire a lawyer. You can ask for a written statement and ask for another consultation. If you will not be shot after consultation, then consider it later. If there is a problem, it will affect the back. My pure experience sharing: The written statement said that the mediation committee member laughed, At the moment, the lawyer of the other party laughed and spat out. After the mediation failed, I immediately asked the lawyer, and the lawyer said that the committee members did not understand. I believed the lawyer and complained to the commissioner. The court concluded, sorry for the attitude of the members. For a new lawyer, the judge of the upper court did not forget to make a written pleading. In the two court sessions, I did not forget to read the pleadings first and how to write the pleadings. Every time the new lawyers have to declare that the previous pleadings were written by other firms, our new pleadings have been re-submitted. Conclusion The first two court hearings clarified that the very shrimp pleadings and the statement pleadings have been updated, and that two court hearings were wasted before they even started, which is equivalent to running the court in vain for two months.