新安東京海上產物保險(股)公司雙和通訊處 - Yonghe District

4/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 新安東京海上產物保險(股)公司雙和通訊處

地址 :

23444, Taiwan, New Taipei City, Yonghe District, Baosheng Rd, 1號新安東京海上產物保險(股)公司雙和通訊處23樓

電話 : 📞 +889877
Opening hours :
Wednesday 8:30AM–5:30PM
Thursday 8:30AM–5:30PM
Friday 8:30AM–5:30PM
Saturday Closed
Sunday Closed
Monday 8:30AM–5:30PM
Tuesday 8:30AM–5:30PM
分類:
城市 : Baosheng Rd

23444, Taiwan, New Taipei City, Yonghe District, Baosheng Rd, 1號新安東京海上產物保險(股)公司雙和通訊處23樓
C
Chang hung-chu on Google

網路申請保險辦理方便
Easy to apply for insurance online
王正華 on Google

業務員服務熱忱。
Salesman service enthusiasm.
張嘉伶 on Google

電話系統爛透了,沒人接也不問你要不要等,直接切掉
劉金金 on Google

送防疫險的申請書,服務人員很親切
山羊 on Google

此營業處還好但其它營業處的某些業務員真是薪水小偷,難怪網上的風評很差。
This office is okay, but some of the salespeople in other offices are really salary thieves, no wonder the online reviews are bad.
葉銘軒 on Google

理賠直接到現場親送 收件小姐服務很專業也很親切
楊怡姝 on Google

櫃臺小姐和理賠科的小姐很溫柔喔!說話輕聲細語。。理賠科先生講解清楚,讓人理解!
陳欣韋 on Google

防疫險去年就開賣,只要當時有居隔單的,保單條款沒限制的沒除外的,不管居隔單是為什麼開的,只要是衛生主管機關開出,就是政府認證的居隔事實,通通都理賠。 然後,4/11林立委在財政委員會諮詢“台產”一案,台產的保單條款有限制因為居家檢疫、集中檢疫…這種被強制隔離(沒有居隔單)的賠嗎? 保險局長說:這種是陪同隔離(陪確診的小孩在家,沒居隔單,沒電子圍籬)是不理賠。 然後,產險公司開始套用。開始把所有父母因小孩(只要不是小孩確診)隔離的,通通都說陪同隔離不理賠。 問題是,台產這個案件,評議還沒出來;然後另外台產還有一件是父母陪隔離的小孩一樣被隔離,有居隔單的申訴結果也還沒出來。 產險公司現在都自己做評議結果,自己試為通案而不理賠,這樣是無政府狀態嗎? 懶人包來了: 影片的陪同隔離是父母陪確診小孩,沒有居隔單;所以就算父母接觸確診者,沒理賠文件需要的居沒隔單,他們也無法申請理賠。 沒有陪同隔離這個詞以前,追有居隔單都有符合新安東京保單條款第21條,通通都理賠;結果4/11之後開始大轉向。請問這樣產險公司我不是只想賺錢,不想理賠嗎?
Epidemic prevention insurance was launched last year. As long as there was a residence permit at that time, and the terms of the policy did not limit it, no matter why the residence permit was issued, as long as it was issued by the competent health authority, it was the government-certified fact of separation. All claims. Then, on 4/11, Legislator Lin consulted with the Finance Committee on the "Taiwan-made" case. The Taiwan-made insurance policy has restrictions on compensation for forced isolation (without a residence permit) due to home quarantine, centralized quarantine...? The Insurance Commissioner said: This is accompanied by quarantine (accompanying the diagnosed child at home, without a living separation sheet, without an electronic fence), and no claim will be paid. Then, property insurance companies began to apply. All parents who have been quarantined because of their children (as long as they are not diagnosed with children) have all said that there is no compensation for accompanying isolation. The problem is that in the case of Taiwanese production, the review has not yet come out; then another Taiwanese production has been quarantined like a child whose parents accompany it, and the result of the appeal has not come out yet. Property and casualty insurance companies now make their own evaluation results, and try to pass the case without paying claims. Is this anarchy? The lazy bag is here: The accompanying quarantine in the film is that parents accompany the diagnosed child, and there is no residence separation order; so even if the parents contact the diagnosed person and do not have the residence separation order required for the claim documents, they cannot apply for compensation. Before the word escort and isolation was used, all of the chasing residence certificates were in line with Article 21 of the Xin'an Tokyo Policy Clause, and all claims were paid; as a result, after 4/11, the big change began. Excuse me, don't I just want to make money with this property insurance company and don't want to pay claims?

Write some of your reviews for the company 新安東京海上產物保險(股)公司雙和通訊處

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *

Recommend a place for you