摩天31社區 - Tamsui District

Super bad community, New Taipei City ranks 5th inside bad community, corruption, underworld, and community tumors, poor households, a pot of porridge was damaged by a group of mouse feces ...... …… —— …… I am more than a household Anyone who knows the inside story depends on the evidence I have …… —— ……

In recent years, the skyscraper community management committee has been controlled by most interested people. These people use line groups and Facebook groups to manipulate community speech in private, prohibit other committee members or residents from expressing objections, and only publish information that is beneficial to them. Whenever someone questioned their decision, the post will be deleted and kicked out of the group. He also suppressed a small number of committee members who were different from them, and even used community management fees to fight private lawsuits.

Not prosecuting does not mean not guilty! During the non-prosecution, the prosecutor believed that it should be a business negligence, and not as bad as the crime of breach of trust ~ Skyscraper was messed up by four people and came here by invitation! Don't take the skyscraper for nothing!

The Ferris 31 Community Protocol stipulates that "the management committee shall serve the public interest (such as collection of management fees) and the management fees shall be used to pay related litigation fees, and individual members shall not use management fees to pay litigation fees for any reason.” Lv Yi and Lin Quan hired lawyers to sue the 18th Chief, Supervisor, and Finance Committee of four persons for breach of trust. The prosecutors no longer prosecute and punish them. Most of the people in the Skyscraper Management Committee even used management fees to pay for litigation costs for reconsideration. , Arguing that it was based on last year’s District Congress resolution. However, last year’s District Congress’s resolution did not name these four people as defendants. The Management Committee never resolved to tell these four people, nor did it authorize Lu Yi and Lin Quanquan to sue on behalf of the Management Committee. Lilu, Yi and Lin, both nakedly used public funds to fight a private lawsuit. Worse still, the lawsuit was lost, which just pierced the lies of most people who wanted to protect the public interest. Meetings of the 18th Management Committee were repeatedly flown due to insufficient attendance of members. Huang Olang, who was the Supervisory Committee (now the 19th Chairperson) at the time, passed the proposal: "Regular or temporary meetings of the current Management Committee, If the meeting is aborted due to insufficient number of members, the chairperson can write a letter of authorization for the proposal of the meeting, obtain the approval of more than half of the members, and put it into the meeting minutes.” According to this, 4 people will execute the community with a written authorization The waterproofing of the top floor and other repair works were met by two people, Lu Yi and Lin Quan, suing four people for breach of trust. According to Article 56 of the Civil Law, if the resolution method of the Management Committee does not comply with the statute, it can be revoked by the court. If the resolution is not filed within 3 months, the resolution of the Management Committee will be determined to be legal and effective, and there will be no so-called violation by Wilson Chen There was a problem with the statute, and the prosecutor also determined that the four people, in accordance with the resolution of the management committee, did not violate the law to perform the repair works such as the waterproofing of the top floor with a written authorization, so they would not prosecute. Some members have proposed that the Skyscraper Management Committee announce the Shilin Land Procuratorate’s non-prosecution sanctions and the Taiwan High Prosecutor’s Office’s dismissal. Please reconsider the sanctions. Most people in the current management committee are afraid that all residents will know the truth and cover up. Refusing to make a public announcement, Wilson Chen even explained the elements of the crime of breach of trust by the prosecution: "If the affairs are only due to negligence in handling affairs and the affairs are adversely affected, it is a matter of negligence in handling affairs, that is, it is not intentional to violate the mission. Acts do not constitute the crime.” This is distorted as the prosecutor’s conviction that several members of the previous term and other defendants did not make resolutions in accordance with the resolutions stipulated in the community statute, but it should be a matter of negligence in handling affairs. However, it is not enough to constitute the elements of the crime of breach of trust. Please inform Wilson Chen as soon as possible to announce the complete content of the sanctions against prosecution, so that the residents can see if the prosecutor has this proof.

In order to prevent the committee from controlling community resources, the Motian 31 community only announces and disseminates speech that is beneficial to its own side. Therefore, residents have long applied for the establishment of a community website in the Zhibang community to avoid the occurrence of one word! Initiated the establishment of FB community and line groups to share community information! In the last few committees, a few members of the previous session signed contracts with manufacturers that amounted to millions of dollars without the management committee’s compliance with the statutory procedures. The complaint was filed at one's own expense, and most of the residents in the follow-up district believed that they should be held accountable, so they should be held accountable through the proposal to protect the public interest! That is, through the proposal to authorize the current management committee to use management fees to pursue the previous members What the prosecutor did! However, the undertaking prosecutor testified that although the defendants of the previous term did not make resolutions in accordance with the resolutions stipulated in the community statute, it should be a matter of negligence in handling affairs, but it is not enough to constitute The elements of the crime of breach of trust. (That is, despite the fact that there is a violation of the statutory resolution method, but it is not yet possible to determine the defendant and other acts with the intention of illegal benefits to sign the above contract), so the final sanction of non-prosecution was imposed! And these committee members made this When signing a contract in violation of the statute, other members and residents had already protested, but the protest at that time was just like C Wang mentioned below, and they "banned other members or residents from expressing their objections"! As a result, other members were now banned. Those who expressed their opinions jumped out and said that others have prohibited them from expressing their opinions! In fact, as early as the district university at the end of 108 years in this community, it was obvious that the district right holder made a judgment. That is, the proposal was passed with a high number of votes. "For members who did not follow the resolutions stipulated in the community agreement, that is, the committee members who signed contracts with the manufacturer or used the community fund for repairs, carried out legal liabilities and recovered the community losses caused by Public Interest."

It doesn't look like much, and it feels like there are too many households. Large old community

There are many facilities in the community and there are clubs for residents to use The basement has a bowling alley, a cinema, a billiard room Golf putting range, sauna There is also a swimming pool on the first floor. Low public ratio, good peripheral functions, neighboring Xinxing Elementary School There are also many kindergartens to choose from, and there are also many security classes. There is no need to worry about eating. There are nearly ten restaurants on the ground floor for dining options. If you feel uncomfortable, you may want to find a clinic, which can be reached within 100 meters. There are also convenience stores and medium-sized stores nearby, and you can find everything from hardware to fresh food. Community parking lots are also available, and there is no need to chase garbage trucks for littering and recycling. There are special areas in the community that can be thrown away at any time. Due to the high floors and the higher point of Danshui, the surrounding scenery is unlikely to be obscured by other buildings. The top floor of the top floor can also overlook the panoramic view of Danshui River, the scenery is very beautiful. But during the northeast monsoon season, the house wind will cut louder. There are four ABCD buildings, each with three elevators, and it is very convenient to get in and out.