台中市北區調解委員會 - North District
3/5
★
基於 8 評論
Contact 台中市北區調解委員會
地址 : | 404, Taiwan, Taichung City, North District, Yongxing St, 301號台中市北區調解委員會3樓 |
電話 : | 📞 +88 |
分類: |
市政府
,
|
城市 : | Yongxing St |
l
|
lisa on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 親切喔
Kindly
|
哈
|
哈哈 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 委員經驗老道?
Experienced members ?
|
0
|
07 Number on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 大多時候不想大聲說話,結果對方大聲就贏???調解甚麼啊??如果是要這麼不專業,搞這做甚麼?
Most of the time I do n’t want to speak loudly, and the other party wins loudly ???
|
M
|
Mercury Lin on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 調委會代辦人員洪小姐非常不專業,只是想詢問調解的問題,態度很不屑,然后回應模糊,這種態度還能做這麼專業的工作我也是醉了。
Ms. Hong, the agent of the Commission, is very unprofessional. She just wants to ask questions about mediation. The attitude is very disdainful, and then the response is vague. This attitude can still do such professional work. I am also drunk.
|
Y
|
Yog Pan on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 調解過程負責調解的人根本沒作用,基本上都只是我們雙方自己再談而已,還說什麼我們案子算小趕著審下一個案子?把我們當塑膠?
During the mediation process, the person in charge of mediation is totally useless. Basically, it is just that we both talk about it by ourselves. Why do we say that our case is too small to try the next case? Treat us as plastic?
|
s
|
seraph hope on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 希望調解的委員能真正公平不要老雙標好嗎,一直帶風向都被看破了還硬要假裝自己很懂,調解不成不是雙方沒誠意不想處理,感覺是委員雙標帶風向過頭導致調解破局吧
I hope the mediation committee members can be really fair and don’t have the old double standards
|
W
|
We Q on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 委員對肇責小說話比較幫腔 反而對大的問事態度推的很乾淨 ,感覺就很雙標。
幾年前在東區調解一次,就感覺那邊的委員很公正客觀幫助雙方解決。
所以覺得不小心意外要是在北區就直接雙方溝通不行上法院 到那是沒什麼幫助
The committee members were more helpful in speaking to Zhao and blamed the small ones, but they pushed the big questions very cleanly, which felt like a double standard.
During a mediation in the Eastern District a few years ago, I felt that the committee members there were very impartial and objective and helped the two sides to resolve the matter.
So I feel that if I accidentally go to the North District, I can't communicate directly with the two parties and I can't go to court. It's not helpful to go there.
|
P
|
P Kate on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 一個白髮蒼蒼阿北(目測至少65歲)
你是不是要去讀一下交通條例
對方是號誌標線都違規,不遵守號誌
竟然說肇事責任低??????
綠燈直行責任大?我問號欸
不就還好我有理賠專員,他一開口講話
你直接閉嘴到結束,當調解委員也是蠻混的,完全在鬼扯,顛倒是非欸!法院負擔大真的不是沒原因,因為調解委員太瞎了?????
不懂就不要出來當什麼調解委員,真的無言!
ps提醒各位,如果案子當下調解很不合理,不需照調解委員說的協調,送法院還比較可以得到合理賠償。
(我的案子已和解,還好有理賠專員,對方也自知違規,肇責大。)
A white-haired Abei (at least 65 years old visually)
Are you going to read the traffic regulations?
The other party is in violation of the signs and lines, and does not obey the signs
Are you saying that the responsibility for the accident is low? ? ? ? ? ?
Is the green light going straight to the big responsibility? I question mark
It's good that I have a claims adjuster who speaks as soon as he opens his mouth
You just shut up until the end, being a mediator is also quite a mess, completely bullshitting, confounding right and wrong! The burden on the court is really not without reason, because the mediator is too blind?????
If you don't understand, don't come out to be a mediator, really speechless!
ps I remind you that if the current mediation of the case is very unreasonable, there is no need to coordinate according to the mediation committee, and it is relatively possible to get reasonable compensation if it is sent to the court.
(My case has been settled. Fortunately, there is a claims specialist, and the other party also knows that he violated the rules and is responsible.)
|
Write some of your reviews for the company 台中市北區調解委員會
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you