天漢工程-杰昌工程有限公司-吊車出租 45噸~400噸 | 起重工程 | 承攬工程 | 鋼構大樓橋樑吊裝 全台服務 - Zhongshan District

Crane rental in the Greater Taipei area, Tianhan Engineering is a very special lifting crane engineering company, they are very professional and very careful about the project. Professional whether it is hoisting large machines or bridges

Extremely not recommended. The former subsidiary needs to hoist equipment. Our company has no experience to fear that the equipment will not be hoisted into the second floor. Therefore, we provide sufficient information in advance, including site photos, equipment tonnage and size, etc., floor side view height, etc., and also explain the site conditions , And even asked whether it is necessary to arrange an on-site survey. I hope that the merchant will respond after fully evaluating whether it is feasible, and the other party will directly agree after reading the message. However, there was only one operator who arrived at the scene that day. After spending more than an hour before and after, he still couldn't go in. Finally, he stopped working. The master said that because the boss did not succeed in hoisting the equipment, she would charge the first hour of appearance fee; but after calling the boss, he said I didn't say that I was hoisting the equipment. I thought it was just hoisting the decoration materials. But he tried to show it to us. It was very helpful only for the appearance fee. He was also assigned to the cooperating master and did not make much money. The above facts stated. The following are the points of controversy. I don’t know what rules and regulations exist in the lifting engineering industry. However, I have even invited on-site evaluation on the premise that I have provided sufficient information. After the merchant has given a possible answer, I believe that the responsibility is not with me. On the other hand, there was a problem with the internal communication of the merchant, and the hoisting equipment was described as hoisting decoration materials, which caused the master to make a mistake in the first estimate. After arriving on the scene, the master did not inform the success probability of the hoisting and directly operated it. In the end, the second thing was not done ( Regardless of the improper hanging method, more than three million pieces of equipment were dented. Obviously, the professionalism is not enough or the risk is underestimated.) Third, when I got the agreement to pay the appearance fee, I was pushed directly by the telecommunications union boss. I did nothing but said that it would be impossible to try to show it to us, and also accused me of being too unreasonable. Above, I think that the business should assess whether they are capable enough to take over the job. Don't think of a solution first and then later, otherwise the owner is prepared to prepare so much information for communication? In the end, the risk has to be borne unilaterally by the owner, which is justified by reason. I also understand that each business has its own strengths and weaknesses, so there is no need to force it. Therefore, the above case is for your reference to the business's way of doing business and mentality. There are pictures to prove that the crane master is a subcontracted manufacturer, so I don’t comment. The remarks are only directed at the crane engineering firm that took the company's case. The firm may not be good at hanging precision equipment, please refer to.