徐樹本小兒科診所 - Sanmin District
3.7/5
★
基於 8 評論
Contact 徐樹本小兒科診所
地址 : | 807, Taiwan, Kaohsiung City, Sanmin District, Jianxing Rd, 373號徐樹本小兒科診所 |
電話 : | 📞 +887878 |
分類: |
兒科醫生
,
|
城市 : | Jianxing Rd |
張
|
張若芃 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 診所連體溫都不量 說體溫不重要?
不知道體溫怎麼吃藥??那給退燒藥的意義在哪
看診也很敷衍 完全沒有認真的感覺
The clinic does not even have a body temperature. Does body temperature not matter?
I don't know how to take my body temperature? ? Where is the meaning of giving antipyretics?
It is also very perfunctory to see a doctor. There is no serious feeling at all.
|
Y
|
YU CHIEH HUANG on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 家裡三個小朋友從出生到現在已經在徐樹本醫師這裡看診二十幾年了,徐醫師對用藥很溫和,不會因為要求好心切而下重藥,問診時也很親切,待人很客氣,對於病情的分析也很客觀,如果有較嚴重的症狀發生時,徐醫師也會細心的安排轉診至大醫院,其中家裡兩個小朋友的血液疾病就是因為徐醫師的細心跟客觀才得以提早發現,個人對於徐醫師的醫德是給與肯定的。
The three children in the family have been seeing Dr. Xu Shuben for more than 20 years since birth. Dr. Xu is very gentle on medication, and will not prescribe heavy medicine because of good intentions. He is also very kind at the consultation and treats people very kindly. The analysis of the condition is also very objective. If there are more serious symptoms, Dr. Xu will carefully arrange for referral to a large hospital. Among them, the blood diseases of the two children in the family were discovered early because of Dr. Xu's carefulness and objectiveness. Personally I affirm Dr. Xu's medical ethics.
|
游
|
游油條 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 醫生人真的很好,個性很幽默也很專業,要看病的可以來這邊看
The doctors are really nice, humorous and professional. Those who want to see a doctor can come here.
|
方
|
方昱仁 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 醫生很親和用心從小學看到大學,值得信賴
The doctor is very friendly and attentive. From elementary school to university, it is trustworthy
|
L
|
LUNG HO YEN on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 很親切啊也很用心的問你的情形啊
一點都不會敷衍
給五顆星按讚
醫生不錯
外面的男護理師更棒
兩顆退燒藥真用心
備而不用
Very kind and attentive to ask about your situation
Not at all perfunctory
Like five stars
Nice doctor
The male nurse outside is better
Two anti-fever medicines are really hard
Prepare instead of
|
J
|
Joyce Lu on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 電話預約親切解說,舒心的疫苗施打經歷
Telephone appointment with cordial explanation, comfortable vaccine administration experience
|
米
|
米豆 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 很特別的新生兒專門科醫生,小孩現在都大學了,剩我去打疫苗看看小感冒,醫生真的很用心,有一點很重要的是我醫界朋友說醫生開的藥品質保證喔…
A very special neonatologist. My child is in college now, so I'm going to get vaccinated to see if I have a cold. The doctor is really attentive. One of the most important things is that my medical friends say that the quality of the medicine prescribed by the doctor is guaranteed...
|
p
|
purple KIM on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 人生首個一星評價給貴診所,
因為文長,結言寫在前頭,
4/24週日看診醫師所作所為令人髮指。
貴醫師情緒性看診且沒給出充分專業的診療,聽從其診斷甚至可能致使病患病情加劇。
小孩嚴重咳嗽經學校老師介紹,大老遠花費半小時車程到貴診所看診。
此前已經初診過一次,診斷為肺炎(非Covid-19)且開立自費抗生素治療,但因病情沒好轉才於4/24再次回診。
回診才被告知此種抗生素療程為服用三天停用三天,需要如此循環4次,家長當下詢問醫師貴診所開立的健保藥物是否也是停三天,醫師解釋只有抗生素需停止但健保藥物照常服用,並叫家長與小孩三天後再回診開立抗生素,但家長顧及平日時間不便且路途遙遠,當下便請醫師一併開立三天健保藥三天抗生素(因為醫師解釋不清楚致使家長誤解,正確應為六日日常藥 加三日抗生素 )
結果醫生突然怒起,斥責語氣說家長用藥知識不對(我會正確我就去當醫師了,還來看醫師?),半強硬的開出六日日常藥 加三日抗生素 ,且要求六日後需再次回診。
爾後,家長詢問孩子肺炎種類(對,看了兩次還不清楚到底是什麼肺炎,家長沒問,但醫師卻也沒給出診斷),醫師回覆說黴漿菌肺炎,家長再詢問此肺炎的感染力是否建議小孩停課?
結果,
醫師大聲回了一句這就看你有沒有道德啊!
請問,是做了什麼缺德事需要醫師站在道德至高點去嚷嚷病患有沒有道德?
民眾之所以提問就不存在偷雞摸狗的思想,而是想知道嚴重性、想遵循醫師擁有的專業性所給出的建議,結果貴為醫生不給出明確且專業判斷,而是說出一句似是而非的話讓人無所適從。
當天,家長一肚子氣帶著小孩和自費加掛號費逾五百的藥物歸家。
隔天,小孩請假在家(真是有道德的好公民),家長聽小孩咳嗽聲不對勁,帶至大醫院看診,醫院醫師診斷:小孩已經肺積水、口服藥物沒有療效、需要住院治療吊點滴。小孩當天就入院。
前一天所有藥物通通只能浪費:)
貴診所醫生當初診療時,隻字未提病患肺積水的可能性,或建議前往醫院診療,只讓家長觀察並再次回診拿自費抗生素,
試問,若是有家長聽從貴診所醫師的診斷,等到再次回診日才帶小孩回貴診所,小孩病情將惡化至如何?(當然,我相信家長本身都有判斷,惡化前一定會緊急送醫,但醫師竟未說明惡化病症及處理,只一昧要病患再回診就令人咋舌)
家長顧及特別時期且醫療資源緊縮才沒一開始就前往大醫院,結果基層診所給出的診斷不足以令病患痊癒,更可能拖延病症,導致更嚴重後果。
而貴診所醫師醫師給出的診療是否又符合「道德」跟「專業」?
平民百姓相信醫師的專業權威,重複回基層診所看診掛號拿自費藥,又是否令醫師滿足了私利?
醫師當日因爲家長仔細詢問,所做出的種種反應又是不是惱羞成怒?
不用勞煩貴診所回覆我,也不用提出什麼補償,因為此生不會再踏入此診所也絕不推薦給親朋好友。留下評論的目的只是分享經驗令網路時代的各位借鑑。
所言句句屬實絕沒有毀謗,也沒有毀謗意圖。
The first one-star evaluation for your clinic in my life,
Because of the length of the article, the conclusion is written at the front,
What the doctor at the clinic did on Sunday 4/24 was outrageous.
Your doctor visited the doctor emotionally and did not give sufficient professional diagnosis and treatment. Following his diagnosis may even aggravate the condition of the patient.
The child had a severe cough and was introduced by the school teacher. He took half an hour to drive to your clinic to see a doctor.
She had been diagnosed for the first time before and was diagnosed with pneumonia (not Covid-19) and prescribed antibiotic treatment at her own expense, but she returned to the doctor on 4/24 because her condition did not improve.
When I returned to the clinic, I was told that the course of antibiotics is three days of use and three days of discontinuation. This cycle needs to be repeated 4 times. The parent immediately asked the doctor if the health care drugs prescribed by your clinic were also stopped for three days. The doctor explained that only the antibiotics need to be stopped but the health care drugs are still as usual. Taking it, and asked the parents and children to come back to the clinic to prescribe antibiotics after three days, but the parents took into account the inconvenience of the weekdays and the long distance, and immediately asked the doctor to prescribe three days of health care medicine and three days of antibiotics (because the doctor did not explain clearly, which caused the parents to misunderstand , the correct should be 6-day daily medicine plus 3-day antibiotic )
As a result, the doctor suddenly became angry, scolded the parents and said that the parent's knowledge of medication was wrong (I will become a doctor, and see a doctor?), and semi-toughly prescribed a daily medicine for six days (at your own expense for three days) plus antibiotics for three days. , and request to return to the doctor after six days.
Afterwards, the parent asked the child about the type of pneumonia (yes, after reading it twice, it was unclear what kind of pneumonia it was, the parent didn’t ask, but the doctor didn’t give a diagnosis), the doctor replied that mycoplasma pneumonia, and the parent asked about the pneumonia. Does Infectivity recommend that children be suspended from school?
result,
The doctor replied aloud, it depends on whether you have morals or not!
Excuse me, what is the immoral thing done that requires doctors to stand on the highest point of morality and shout that patients are immoral?
The reason why people ask questions is not because of the idea of stealing chickens and dogs, but because they want to know the seriousness and follow the advice given by the professionalism of doctors. The result is that doctors do not give clear and professional judgments, but say a plausible statement. Confused.
On the same day, the parents returned home angrily with their children and more than 500 medicines at their own expense and registration fee.
The next day, the child asked for leave at home (really a good and virtuous citizen). Parents heard that the child’s cough was not right, and took him to a large hospital to see a doctor. The hospital doctor diagnosed that the child had pulmonary edema, and the oral medication was ineffective. He needed hospitalization and a drip. The child was admitted to the hospital that day.
All the medicines from the previous day can only be wasted :)
When the doctor of your clinic made a diagnosis, he didn't mention the possibility of the patient's pulmonary hydrops, or suggested to go to the hospital for diagnosis and treatment, and only let the parents observe and come back again to get antibiotics at their own expense.
I would like to ask, if some parents listen to the diagnosis of your clinic doctor and wait until the day of the second visit to bring the child back to your clinic, how will the child's condition deteriorate? (Of course, I believe that the parents themselves have their own judgments, and they will be sent to the doctor urgently before the deterioration, but the doctor has not explained the deterioration of the disease and the treatment, and only asks the patient to return to the doctor, which is staggering.)
Due to the special period and the shortage of medical resources, parents did not go to major hospitals at the beginning. As a result, the diagnosis given by the primary clinics was not enough for the patients to recover, and it was more likely to delay the disease and lead to more serious consequences.
And does the diagnosis and treatment given by the physicians in your clinic conform to "morality" and "professionalism"?
Ordinary people believe in the professional authority of doctors, and repeatedly return to grassroots clinics to see and register to get medicines at their own expense. Does the doctor satisfy their own interests?
Was the doctor's various reactions that day because of the parents' careful inquiries, were they angry and embarrassed?
Don't bother your clinic to reply to me, and don't have to offer any compensation, because I will never step into this clinic again in this life and will never recommend it to my relatives and friends. The purpose of leaving a comment is just to share the experience so that everyone in the Internet age can learn from it.
The words and sentences are true and there is no slander and no intention of slander.
|
Write some of your reviews for the company 徐樹本小兒科診所
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you