國喬石油化學股份有限公司 - Dashe District

Name: 國喬石油化學股份有限公司 - Dashe District
Address: 815, Taiwan, Kaohsiung City, Dashe District, Xinggong Rd, 4號國喬石油化學股份有限公司, Xinggong Rd, Taiwan

2.6/5 ★ 基於 8 評論

Contact 國喬石油化學股份有限公司

地址：	815, Taiwan, Kaohsiung City, Dashe District, Xinggong Rd, 4號國喬石油化學股份有限公司
電話：	📞 +8879
網站：	http://www.gppc.com.tw/
分類：	製造商 , 煤氣公司 , 工業化學品批發商 ,
城市：	Xinggong Rd

815, Taiwan, Kaohsiung City, Dashe District, Xinggong Rd, 4號國喬石油化學股份有限公司

Best Manufacturer in Taiwan

E	Evelyn Tu on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 每股盈餘$4.52，只發0.1股息？？？？盈餘只分配給董監事，當大家都沒有眼睛在看嗎.......希望你們知道輿論的力量，還股東們應有的權利 Earnings per share of $4.52, with only 0.1 dividend? ? ? ? The surplus is only allocated to the directors and supervisors. When everyone has no eyes to see... I hope you know the power of public opinion and return the rights that the shareholders should have
林	林信宏 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 看著貴公司網站：『上下一心，言行一致，你不滿意，我不成功』再看看網友對貴公司評價：高董監酬勞卻低配息，格外的諷刺若公司這麼不好只能配息0.1，為什麼董監酬勞要這麼高？不是很矛盾嗎？『上下一心，言行一致，你不滿意，我不成功』 Looking at your company website: "One heart, consistent words and deeds, you are not satisfied, I am not successful" Let's take a look at what netizens say about your company: High remuneration for directors and supervisors but low dividends, particularly ironic If the company is so bad, it can only pay a dividend of 0.1, why should the remuneration of directors and supervisors be so high? Isn't it contradictory? "One heart, consistent words and deeds, you are not satisfied, I am not successful"
ま	まこと on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 去年賺4.5元，負債比那麼低，自由現金也不差，結果只配0.1，你們是當投資你們的眾多股東們比雞腿便當還不如嗎？也完全沒有解釋原因……隨便找理由搪塞…（理由恐怕連你們自己也不信吧）…這就是貴公司歸於投資人的態度嗎？你們企業家的風骨呢？ Earning 4.5 yuan last year, the debt ratio is so low, the free cash is not bad, and the result is only 0.1. Are you thinking that the many shareholders who invested in you are worse than a chicken leg lunch? I didn’t explain the reason at all...just find a reason for prevarication...(I’m afraid you don’t even believe the reason)...Is this the attitude of your company to investors? What about your entrepreneurial character?
郭	郭力銘 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 國喬公司連賺3年EPS達10.03,卻只在今年發給股東每張股票100元股利,而董監連續2年領了1.2億酬勞,令人不齒,這就是公司所謂因擴大投資怕資金不足懇請股東們共體時艱嗎? Guoqiao Company has earned EPS of 10.03 for three consecutive years, but only issued a 100 yuan dividend per share to shareholders this year, and the directors and supervisors have received 120 million in remuneration for two consecutive years, which is disgusting. This is the company's so-called fear of capital due to expansion of investment. Isn't it enough to implore shareholders to share the difficult time?
D	Dylannon Chang on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 我是持有國喬公司股票的投資人，這幾年來不管賺多賺少，公司始終是一毛不拔（今年0.1）。公司這樣罔顧股東權益，卻是大發董監獎金，實在令人不服氣。網路時代要聚集不滿的股東是越來越方便，請公司不要小看這股力量。再加上公司獲利好，市場關注的大戶只要結合這股不滿的力量，後果難料。請公司自重。 I am an investor who holds the shares of Guoqiao Company. In the past few years, no matter how much money has been earned, the company has always been stubborn (0.1 this year). The company disregarded the rights and interests of shareholders in such a way, but it issued a big bonus for directors and supervisors, which is really unconvincing. In the Internet age, it is more and more convenient to gather dissatisfied shareholders. Please do not underestimate this power. Coupled with the fact that the company is profitable, as long as the big players in the market focus on this force of dissatisfaction, the consequences are unpredictable. Ask the company to respect itself.
周	周志武 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2020年賺 4.52 EPS 小股東配息0.1 董監事配0.7 公司如果為了未來發展而不配息為何董監事不能同進退也配0.1 呢？董監事平常在公司不是就都有薪水領拿那麼多股息公司怎麼成長呢！不要自打嘴巴 Google 只能評論1～5星其實我只是想給0.1顆星多出來的0.9顆星算送給董監事們～不用謝我 Earn 4.52 EPS in 2020. Minority shareholder dividends of 0.1. Directors and supervisors pay 0.7. If the company does not pay dividends for future development, why can’t the directors and supervisors also pay 0.1 at the same time? Directors and supervisors usually have salaries in the company. How can the company grow with so many dividends? Don’t talk to yourself. Google can only comment on 1~5 stars. In fact, I just want to give 0.1 stars and the extra 0.9 stars will be given to the directors and supervisors~ Don’t thank me
葉	葉靖瀅 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 公司年年賺大錢，配股配息卻年年低，去年賺4元多，只配息0.1元給股東，董監卻領9000多萬，這不是圖利高層壓榨股東嗎？請公司回復正常公司該有的配股配息，董事長及背後大老能拿出你們的良心良知出來對待投資你們的股東 The company makes a lot of money every year, but the distribution of dividends is low year after year. Last year it earned more than 4 yuan, and only paid 0.1 yuan to shareholders, but the directors and supervisors received more than 90 million. Isn't this trying to benefit the shareholders? Please reply to the normal company’s allotment and dividends, the chairman and the elders behind them can show your conscience and conscience to treat the shareholders who invested in you
書	書弘 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 身為眾多投資貴公司的投資人之一認為 : 為了不配股、少配息，把貴公司形容成缺錢、盈利績效不穩的上市公司；但卻在董事會通過發出「全部上市公司董監酬勞名列前15名的董監事酬勞」之決議連續2年領了1.2億且多數董監未持任何一股股份但連續投資三年的股東卻只在今年領到$100股息（台北買便當都不夠），這妥當嗎? As one of the many investors who invest in your company, he believes: In order to not allot shares and reduce dividends, describe your company as a listed company that lacks money and has unstable profitability; but the board of directors approved the issue of "remuneration for directors and supervisors of all listed companies." The “Top 15 Directors and Supervisors Remuneration” resolution has received 120 million for two consecutive years and most of the directors and supervisors did not hold any shares, but shareholders who invested for three consecutive years received only $100 in dividends this year (Taipei’s lunch is not enough. ), is this appropriate?