高雄市政府行政暨國際處 - Section 2

Facilitate public consultation

Please keep my true evaluation, don't delete it maliciously, don't do it if you don't see it, don't be afraid of others saying it, thank you. 2021/9/30 Members asked, Miao Boya also said: Consumer protection officers should protect the rights and interests of consumers in accordance with the law. However, the reality is that there are dereliction consumer protection officers in the Consumer Protection Office in Kaohsiung. It is no wonder that people will be found on the Internet who have to change to apply for consumer protection officers in other counties and cities. If you don't want Kaohsiung, you really have a record of protection. In addition, there are also negative comments on Kaohsiung's consumer protection officers from many different people and different events, such as the most inactive, most exaggerated consumer protection officers, and so on. And after I actually went there, I realized that this is really the case. It’s not that everyone is talking nonsense, trying all means to force consumers to sign as soon as possible, and I dare not say a word to the manufacturer for any violations such as the consumer protection law and the finalized contract. I dare not say that, in turn, the regulations of illegal manufacturers and companies have been threatening consumers, and the national laws are lower than the regulations of private companies. The consumer security officer Zheng X Cong really has you. The fact that you don’t talk about right or wrong means that it doesn’t matter how the manufacturer or company violates the law, but consumers must abide by the manufacturer’s non-compliance with the consumer protection law and the manufacturer’s private regulations of the finalized contract, and he probably pays attention to closing the case. Let’s just behave, it’s more important to look good on performance appraisal, and consumer protection ~ self-insurance officer is more in line with the facts. On the contrary, at that time, some other officials and helpers in Kaohsiung who had no official position were obviously more law-abiding, honest and responsible. It is hoped that personnel can be replaced as soon as possible, so that good people with conscientiousness will be put in the position, and the dereliction of employees will be kicked out. Otherwise, it is clearly something that Kaohsiung should protect. It will become that only the consumer protection officers of other counties and cities have the basic legal protection. What does it mean? ? Salary thief? It's useless? Would the chief of Kaohsiung come out to control it? With me, there will be at least 4 negative reviews from Kaohsiung consumer protection officials that can be found on the Internet in 2021. I don’t know if it’s the same self-preservation officer’s great achievements, and many people are willing to praise it. Compared with the good deeds and law-abiding records of consumer protection officers in other counties and cities, the standards are too far behind, right?