DQPA 社團法人 台灣住宅品質消費者保護協會
4.2/5
★
基於 8 評論
Contact DQPA 社團法人 台灣住宅品質消費者保護協會
地址 : | 22050, Taiwan, New Taipei City, Banqiao District, Section 1, Wenhua Rd, 189號DQPA 社團法人 台灣住宅品質消費者保護協會4樓 |
電話 : | 📞 +8888 |
網站 : | http://www.dqpa.org/ |
分類: |
協會或組織
,
|
城市 : | Wenhua Rd |
鐘
|
鐘鈺麒 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 很為客戶著想的優良單位
Excellent unit for the sake of customers
|
m
|
mei hs on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 任何室內裝修疑問、或住宅發生裝修糾紛需要諮詢或鑑定時,全台唯一的專業型消費者保護團體,是可以信賴的單位。
When any interior decoration question or residential dispute arises from consultation or identification, the only professional consumer protection group in Taiwan is a reliable unit.
|
吳
|
吳樂天 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 不是真正的調解單位
反而是見風轉舵
看人家大陣仗有律師
就沒幫受害者發聲
Not a real mediation unit
Instead, turn the rudder by the wind
There are lawyers in the big battle
Didn't help the victim
|
陳
|
陳駿逸 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 第一次來參與是已介紹人的身分被牽扯進來....
還好這裏是非常公正的一個單位,不會因為單方面說詞受到影響,一樣要求舉證採取判斷。
主持人在申訴方一直用受害者的角度去陳述事情經過的情況下,也不會被影響,公平公正的去理清問題真相與內容的資訊,也提供了許多方式去建議對方。
The first time to participate was that the identity of the introduced person was involved ...
Fortunately, this is a very impartial unit. It will not be affected by unilateral speech, and it will also require proof to use judgment.
The moderator will not be affected if the complainant always uses the victim's perspective to describe the course of the incident. He will also be able to sort out the truth and content of the issue fairly and fairly, and also provide many ways to advise the other party.
|
H
|
HP Chen on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 因為衛浴裝修糾紛而申請調解會
感謝吳先生給很多工程上的建議
但是另外一位律師立場太過偏頗於業者
沒有保護到消費者
只會一直要我們舉證
好像很趕時間想要趕快讓調解結束
因為工程延宕那麼久造成我們生活不便 業者本來就要負責
講的好像消費者只是在要賠償而已
建議要有多一點同理心
Application for mediation due to bathroom renovation disputes
Thanks to Mr. Wu for a lot of engineering suggestions
But another lawyer's position is too biased
No protection to consumers
Just keep asking us to give evidence
Seems to be in a hurry and wants to end the mediation quickly
Because the delay of the project has caused us inconvenience.
It seems like the consumer is just asking for compensation
Suggest a little more empathy
|
劉
|
劉宗宗 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1.我經過本處調解2次,第一次問題在於冷氣盒尺寸不符合,本處安排理事長主持,但本處調解狀況並不夠完整,怎麼說呢,原因本處未經義務釐清為什麼會做錯尺寸?“未查明真相”事後結果變成三方要負擔修繕費用,而實際狀況是裝潢工故意可能或經驗不足做錯,但本處未協助釐清,讓我還要負擔修繕費用,讓本人感到疑惑。
2.第二次調解是一位律師主持,但調解原因是裝潢工把冷氣盒的冷氣銅管折斷,需要重新配管跟冷氣盒重做,其費用約25000上下,但在調解過程,律師並未就賠償費用上為我主張實際修繕金額,而之後莫名談成16800元,只能勉強接受,現場沒有安排裝潢技工來為這個事件做釐清,調解合約內容裡,律師還主動加了一條不得在網路上公佈對裝潢廠商不利之事情,我覺得這一條在袒護裝潢廠商,不是站在公平公正腳色,就費用來說我還是虧錢要重新裝潢,我應該有法律行使權幾廣大消費者著想,為什麼本處要寫上這一條?我實在不懂。分享兩次疑惑調解情況。
3.調解不見得是公正,自己要非常清楚自己的權益跟狀況,不要被調解員帶走,自己要判斷事情的細節,只有你自己才能為自己爭取公正的權益。
4.調解費用一次500是用公益方式,裡面大部分都是志工身份,人力也是要資薪,我覺得調解費用太便宜了,本處好像說調解一件成功政府補貼20元,調解太超值了。
1. I passed the mediation twice. The first problem was that the size of the air-conditioner was not met. The department arranged the chairman to preside over it, but the mediation situation of the department was not complete. How can we say that the reason is that the department has not clarified why it will Do the wrong size? The result of the "unrecognized truth" became the burden of repairs by the three parties. The actual situation was that the decorators were deliberately or inexperienced, but the Department did not assist in clarifying the situation. I was also burdened with the cost of repairs and I was puzzled.
2. The second mediation was presided over by a lawyer, but the reason for the mediation was that the decorator broke the air-conditioning copper tube of the air-conditioner and needed to re-manage the air-conditioner and redo the box. The cost was about 25,000, but during the mediation process, the lawyer did not As for the compensation, I advocated the actual repair amount, and then inexplicably negotiated into 16,800 yuan, and I could barely accept it. There was no decoration technician at the scene to clarify the incident. In the content of the mediation contract, the lawyer also took the initiative to add a net. On the road, I announced that it is not good for decorating manufacturers. I feel that this article is not a fair and just way to protect the decorating manufacturers. In terms of cost, I still have to lose money to re-decorate. I should have the right to exercise the law. Why do you want to write this one? I really don't understand. Share two doubts about mediation.
3. Mediation is not necessarily fair. You must be very clear about your rights and conditions. Don't be taken away by the mediator. You must judge the details of the matter. Only you can fight for your own fair rights.
4. Mediation expenses 500 is a public welfare method. Most of them are volunteers. The manpower is also a salary. I think the mediation fee is too cheap. The department seems to say that mediation is a successful government subsidy of 20 yuan. The value is up.
|
Y
|
Yuting on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 調處委員非常公正,過程中有效率地釐清雙方的主張及需求,協助雙方有效溝通,帶領解決問題,能感受到專業與熱誠,以及良善。每一次致電諮詢相關問題時,也都耐心傾聽與回應,讓我們感到安心!非常感謝!!
希望能持續經營,讓更多人知道這個單位,在裝潢前能具備更多基本的裝潢知識,以防範裝潢不肖業者,若真的遇到糾紛也能知道有此管道可以協尋,在無助中能看到盼望!
The mediation committee members are very impartial. During the process, they have clarified the claims and needs of both parties effectively, assisted both parties in effective communication, and led to problem solving. They can feel professionalism, enthusiasm, and goodness. Every time we call to consult related questions, we also listen and respond patiently, making us feel at ease! thank you very much! !
I hope to continue the operation, let more people know this unit, and have more basic decorating knowledge before decorating, to prevent the decorating industry. If you really encounter disputes, you can also know that this channel can help you find it. I can see hope!
|
陳
|
陳瑩 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 有點傻眼 裝修已經拖了半年了 裝潢費付了九成 弄的一團糟 希望來這裡可以幫忙調解拿回一些賠償
我不懂欸 主持人一直幫著裝修公司講話 不然就是一直跟我們說要鑑定 之前電話說會幫忙評估一下工程的好壞 結果帶的那些瑕疵照片根本一點也沒用 看完什麼也沒說 協調的意義是??浪費一個下午告訴我們
裝修公司也可以告我們 如果之後要找其他人進來 因為我們還沒解約。還說我們被提到的有效期比我們吿他們的時間長???我就想問問如果裝修那方聽到這樣 會願意賠錢了事嗎? 協調白費
|
Write some of your reviews for the company DQPA 社團法人 台灣住宅品質消費者保護協會
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you