司法大廈 - Section 1

"Open Taipei" event Can enter and visit If you are lucky enough to follow the guide or listen to it Will feel more 17:00 There are lights outside But only the clock is not large

The National Monuments Tour of the Judicial Yuan is a very special building!

This is lawyer Wang Zhiyang, the property distributor entrusted by his father. In order to seize his father's large area of ​​land next to the Hsinchu Science Park, he colluded with his father and his children and killed his father by destroying humanity. It was derived. 1. Hsinchu District Public Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu accused Wang Zhiyang of forgery in order to cover me In the document case, Wang Zhiyang was not subject to judicial prosecution, and I was framed by false accusation. Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu used his power to collude with Wang Zhiyang and at the same time compromised the criminal evidence and confession comparison evidence of the forged document that I sued Wang Zhiyang, so that the criminal evidence and confession were compared. All the exhibits became a 2-page property distribution letter in B4 format on October 19, 1988 with exactly the same format and content. Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu also marked the "first property distribution book" and "the first property distribution book with a pencil" on the property distribution book after the package was dropped. "Second Property Distribution Letter", the first property distribution statement is stamped with "One blue oval seizure seal of the District Court of Hsinchu, Taiwan." The property distribution statement and the property distribution statement contained in the indictment were dropped by the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu The "format, number of pages, content, and staple hole position" do not match, and on January 24, 1992, the first property distribution letter submitted by the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu to the court was A4 format 3 on October 19, 1988. The second page, the second page, lawyer Wang Zhiyang deliberately replaced the second page of his father’s property distribution letter in A4 format dated May 23, 1988. Therefore, there are records in Article 6 of the property distribution letter dated October 19, 1988. I was also ordered to submit to Zhan Zhaoshu by the court. The prosecutor’s second property distribution letter was a three-page property distribution letter dated October 19, 1988 in A4 format, which was yellowed and creased. Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu again abused his power and charged me with false accusations. 2. In order to prevent me from suing Wang Zhiyang for the forgery of a document, Judge Feng Junlang was not subject to judicial trial. He knew that the court and witness Wang Zhiyang had not been held on June 4, 1992. Judge Feng Junlang made a case at 2 pm on June 3, 1992. 30 minutes on the day after I was summoned in the Ninth Court, I used my power to collude with Wang Zhiyang and jointly completed the criminal evidence of the forged document from me against Wang Zhiyang outside the court, which became the 2-page property distribution letter in B4 format on October 19, 1988. Judge Feng Junlang agreed In the last line of the second page of the property distribution book after the package was replaced, stamped with "Judge Feng Junlang June 4, 1992, 3 red stamps". I have never provided my father with a pleading or court submission. October 19, 88 A 2-page property distribution letter in B4 format to the Hsinchu District Prosecutor's Office or the court. 3. Judges Wang Wenying, Cai Xinyi, and Feng Junlang used their powers to collude with Wang Zhiyang on a day before the criminal judgment on January 9, 1993 in order to frame me and violate the law, and order Wang Zhiyang to print his father October 19, 1988 on the computer. On January 24, 1992, the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu, signed and stamped by his father, signed and sealed by his father. The original copy of the 2-page property distribution book on October 19, 1988 in B4 format on October 19, 1988. , Open the judge and publish the contents of the property distribution letter after the package is closed on the fifth line from the 10th page of the court’s judgment, as the basis for the judgment in violation of the law. 4. When I was in the court of the Prefectural Court, I repeatedly submitted a written pleading or court to my father to the trustee of property distribution lawyer Wang Zhiyang. From July 19, 1989 to February 27, 1990, there were a total of 9 certificates of deposit letters. At the same time, Chen Ming’s father’s 9 deposit letters contained at least two handwritings, and none of them were written by me. My handwriting can be from the father’s date of February 11, 1990 to April 8 of the same year. Fang, I am instructed by my father to add important matters. The handwriting to be added is my handwriting, and from December 27, 1989 to April 8, 1990, a total of 17 autograph letters to Wang Zhiyang and his father Certification Notice No. 0219 dated January 8, 1990. In the court of the court, I would like to submit the documents to my father to open the documents and Chen Ming that all 9 of my father’s deposition letters were not written by me. The presiding judge Wang Wenying said: There are already multiple copies of the documents that my father opened, and he left by himself. Going to the dock, quietly counted the number of the father's deposit letter and autograph letter, and at the same time repeatedly read the father's deposit letter and autograph letter, and sent a total of 10 copies to Wang Zhiyang from February 11, 1990 to April 8 of the same year. The handwriting added on the left side of the handwritten letter was repeatedly checked with the handwriting of the father’s 9 deposit letters, and finally the father’s certification notice No. 0219 dated January 8, 1990 was taken away. According to the Court’s Judgment on page 5, 2 stated: "The re-witness Wang Zhiyang sent out the property distribution letter issued on October 19, 1988 on April 7, 1989, and received it with his father’s signature and fingerprints. The deposit certificate sent on July 19, 1989, October 13 of the same year, and the same month on the 18th of the same month...Three copies of the deposit letter issued from the post office of Zhongzheng Airport at the defendant’s work place can be clicked to confirm that the judge deliberately Concealing his father from November 8, 1989 to February 27, 1990, a total of 6 letters of evidence to Wang Zhiyang, the judge of Shangkai committed the crime of obliterating criminal evidence; the judge of Shangkai also concealed his father from January 8, 1990 to the notary office The certification notice letter No. 0219, and a total of 17 autographed letters from his father to Wang Zhiyang, also violated the crime of annihilation of evidence; the penultimate line on page 6 of the verdict fabricated "The defendant’s deposition letter from July 19, 1989 on behalf of His father declared that he gave the gift free of charge, expanded the scope of the gift, and added the conditions for the countersignature," Shangkai Judge has violated the forgery of official documents. 5. In the Prefectural Court’s Trial Chamber and the Verbal Debate Chamber, no judge or prosecutor has ever produced or presented evidence that I have committed a false accusation. According to the Prefectural Prosecutor’s Office on July 20, 1993, Zhu Jian Yun Du Ninety-three was granted 137 Zi Letter No. 15179, returning the seized property in my false accusation case is October 19, 1988, B4 format, two pages of property distribution letter, and the last line of the second page is stamped with "Judge Feng Junlang June 4, 1992 red title seal "3", confirming that in order to vain the law, the judge deliberately used Judge Feng Junlang's criminal evidence as evidence of my false accusation and sentenced me. 6. The High Court opened the Preparatory Procedure Chamber in the Tenth Court at 9:30 am on March 15, 1993. No prosecutors came to the court to state the main points of the prosecution. The judges Li Wencheng, Jiang Zhenyi, and Zhou Yingwen did not investigate the crime of false accusation. Evidence, not to mention the evidence that I committed the crime of false accusation, even the trial court and the verbal debate court were not willing to convene, and the evidence of Judge Feng Junlang’s crime was also planted as evidence of my false accusation. It was revolved on April 13, 1993. I rejected my appeal for false accusation. The judge of Shangkai was a verdict in violation of the law, and the judge of Shangkai knew that no prosecutor was present in the preparatory proceedings court to present the main points of the prosecution. The second line on page 18 of the High Court’s judgment fabricated "This case was reported by the prosecutor Shen Shizhen. Court duties perform duties", Shangkai judges violated the forgery of official documents. 7. Prosecutor Fu Yijun’s 98-year Tazi No. 2099, replacing the 94-year Tazi No. 2055 and Donggu prosecutors, and the 97-year Tazi No. 2565, Xiagu prosecutors held intensive court sessions, and investigated Judge Feng Junlang In collusion with Wang Zhiyang to complete the case of surrendering criminal exhibits and committing dereliction of duty and forging documents outside the court, Prosecutor Fu Yijun asked two bailiffs to stand beside me when he opened the court for the first time. Prosecutor Fu Yijun then said in a terrifying tone: "Mr. Cai, you tell Judge Feng Junlang to collude with Wang Zhiyang to complete the case of exchanging criminal exhibits, committing malfeasance, and forging documents outside the court. If you are willing to tell, what will I do? Nothing happened, and I will not investigate. If you refuse to tell you thoroughly, be careful I will imprison you in court.” I immediately said: “Judge Feng Junlang was at 2:30 pm on June 3, 1992. The day after the Ninth Court subpoenaed me, I used his authority to collude with Wang Zhiyang to complete the criminal exhibits outside the court of the forgery document from Wang Zhiyang. The format, the number of pages, and the content are not the same, and in order to be consistent with the “stapling pinhole position is also inconsistent” on the second line of page 5 of the indictment, it has been processed and manufactured by an unknown person with a stapler. An inconsistent staple hole is also drawn in a pencil circle. Judge Feng Junlang also stamped the last line of the second page of the property distribution book after the package was replaced with "Judge Feng Junlang June 4, 1992, 3 red stamps", and I did not provide the 2 pages of B4 format on October 19, 88 The property distribution letter was given to the District Prosecutor's Office or the District Court. Judge Feng Junlang has committed dereliction of duty and forged documents. There is hard evidence that Judge Feng Junlang has committed malfeasance and forged documents. Prosecutor Fu Yijun slapped the table vigorously with his hands and raised his voice: "What did you say? You say it again and see." I repeated it again, requesting that it be dealt with in accordance with the law in court. Judge Fu Yijun waved his hand and said, "You can go back now." It was confirmed that Prosecutor Fu Yijun was fully aware of my complaint against Judge Feng Junlang on charges of malfeasance and forgery of documents. In addition, at 3:50 p.m. on January 28, 1999, at the Procuratorate’s 1998 Annual He Zi No. 2099 in the ninth court’s investigation and verification court, I reiterated the opening statement, requesting a thorough investigation of Judge Feng Junlang’s case in this case. , Accepting or expecting unlawful interests, and aggravated Judge Feng Junlang's punishment for corruption. Prosecutor Fu Yijun deliberately covered up Judge Feng Junlang’s crimes, knowing that I filed a complaint with Judge Feng Junlang on the basis of malfeasance and forged documents, and in this case, I have never filed a complaint against Judge Wang Wenying and Cai Xinyi, and only the content and pages are required. The numbers are the same. If you zoom in from A4 format to B4 format, or shrink from B4 format to A4 format, there is no penalty for format modification in the Criminal Law. According to Zhujian Guoyong 98 He 2099 Zi No. 09488 of his closing letter dated April 6, 1999 by the Prefectural Procuratorate, Prosecutor Fu Yijun fabricated my case against Judges Feng Junlang, Wang Wenying, and Cai Xinyi for tampering with the format and annihilating evidence, but did not propose annihilation. As evidenced by the evidence, Prosecutor Fu Yijun shielded Judge Feng Junlang with iron evidence that he committed dereliction of duty and forged documents. 8. The Prosecutor’s Office dated May 28, 1999, Zhujian Guozhi 99 Ta 184 Zi No. 15344 Case Closing Letter, and the tenth line on page 3 states: "After reviewing the Office’s 1993 Enforcement Zi No. 137 File , The first property distribution letter attached to the volume of July 20, 1993 Zhujian Yundu 93 Zhibao 137 Zi No. 15179 letter is in B4 format and a total of 2 papers (a total of 4 front and back pages after folding in half, but the fourth The pages are blank, as shown on pages 35-36 of the open dossier above), and pages 1 to 3 are respectively covered with 2 blue confiscation seals of the Department, and the results of the inspection by the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu "The first property distribution book No. The paper quality of 3 pages is quite different from the first and second pages, and the position of the staple hole is not consistent." There is no difference. The photocopy of the property distribution book attached to Exhibit 3 in the whistleblowing letter recognized by the platform is the property distribution book after the package was dropped. However, the photocopy of the property distribution book attached to the exhibit 3 should be the second property that has not been exchanged. The distribution of the photocopy of the book was based on the fact that the prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu had dropped the second page of the first property distribution book. It should be unfounded. It was confirmed that Prosecutor Hou Shaoqing deliberately shielded Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu’s crimes and used the power of the prosecutor to retrieve evidence of Judge Feng Junlang’s crime that was not related to the case of Prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu’s subcontracting. It was found that Judge Feng Junlang was at the end of page 2 of the criminal evidence. Covered with "Judge Feng Junlang June 4, 1992, 3 red title badges." Prosecutor Hou Shaoqing first folded the criminal evidence of Judge Feng Junlang in half, and then used the power of the prosecutor to process the evidence of Judge Feng Junlang’s crime. Covered with "3 blue confiscation stamps from the Prefectural Procuratorate", deceived that prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu did not drop the first property distribution letter, and prosecutor Zhan Zhaoshu also dropped the second property distribution letter.

Judicial Mansion is a building designated as a National Historic Site in Taiwan in 1998. This building, with its distinctive light green tiles, was originally built in 1934 (Showa 9) during the Japanese occupation by the Supreme Court of the Governor-General of Taiwan, the Taipei District Court and the Public Prosecutor's Office. It was built as an agency building. At present, the location of the clock in the center of the front had a chrysanthemum crest prize attached to it during the Japanese rule. This area, called the Boai district, can be said to be the "Kasumigaseki of Taiwan" where the central government of Taiwan is concentrated, but at the same time, there are many buildings built during the Japanese era, and it is an irresistible area for those who like history and architecture. But also. The fact that these buildings function as active or exhibition halls, rather than just historic sites, is an attractive point of Taiwan. For your information, ☆ Proposal of model course (half day required) From Taipei Station South Sanmen, follow Zhongxiao West Road on your right (westward) and you will see a two-story red brick building on your right. In front of it, after passing through [② Beimen] on the left, [③ Taipei Beimen Post Office]. Take Taipei North Gate Post Office on your left and head straight south on Hakuai Road. On your right you will find [④ Zhongshan Hall (Former Taipei Public Hall)] and on your right, you will find [⑤ Former Imperial Life Company Former Xia Xintai Artifacts] Mansion], go for less than 5 minutes and go to Patriotic West Road. Turn left and follow Patriotic West Road a little to the east. As soon as you cross Chongqing South Road, turn left and head north. You will find a red brick brick wall and a stone brick wall on your left. It is followed by a square and heavy building [⑨Taishi Bank Head Office]. On the way, on the right hand side of the intersection between [⑦Judiciary Mansion] and [⑧Presidential Office], there is [⑩ Taipei Municipal Dai-ichi Women's High School]. Go north on Chongqing South Road. If you are hungry, head to Taipei Station and refuel with Fuzhou Seso Pepper Mochi on your right. If you are not hungry, you will pass the ⑨Taky 銀行 Bank Head Office, and when you see citybank on your right, turn right (Xiangyang Road). Continue straight ahead, and you will find "Nanpachi Bank" in the left hand side with "Kanyo Bank Old Xia", "Mitsui Bussan Co., Ltd. Old Xia" and on the right hand the "National Taikei Museum" and "⑭Taipei 228 Memorial Hall". ". If you're fine, you can't miss [⑮ National Taiwan University Medical Center West Site] and [⑯ Taipei Guest House], which are located across the park road. If you like architecture in particular, you should not miss the Taipei Taipei Hotel. Thank you for your good work.

The National Assembly of the Republic of China is "entrusted by all the people", and based on the legacy of Dr. Sun Yat-sen's founding of the Republic of China, in order to consolidate state power, protect civil rights, establish social peace, and improve people's welfare, this Constitution is enacted, promulgated throughout the country, and will always be followed. Human rights are equal under the fulfillment of obligations, men are forced to be soldiers under equal conditions, look down on women and do not include women, other people are also human beings, and everyone should perform their obligations equally. Can human rights challenge the constitution? What is a human rights constitution? Right - right (right) duty - right? Has the people's obligation to show their rights been black-boxed by the judiciary?

The legal man passed by. In the first year of Yuanmu Junior College, Professor Shi Qingpu took us to visit, and also visited the opening court of Taipei Diyuan. At that time, my classmates, including me, did not cherish good fortune. It was not until after graduation, tutoring, national exams, practice work and other experiences that the professor realized that the professor had a good intention, because the professor had no obligation to ask for trouble. It is not necessary to bring a group. The frizzy students who pass the exam visit the real first-line judiciary. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Shi Qingpu cautiously.