可承國際股份有限公司 - Section 3
4.2/5
★
基於 8 評論
Contact 可承國際股份有限公司
地址 : | 241, Taiwan, New Taipei City, Sanchong District, Section 3, Chongyang Rd, 192-2號可承國際股份有限公司 |
電話 : | 📞 +8898 |
網站 : | http://www.nesting.com.tw/ |
分類: |
批發商
,
|
城市 : | Chongyang Rd |
許
|
許逸帆 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 收錢搞消失 滿口謊言 還騙出貨了 我說的就是蒸烤爐
Collect money and disappear, full of lies, and cheated to sell, what I'm talking about is the steam oven
|
韓
|
韓森 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 維修洗衣機
韓技師 與黃技師 很有耐心傾聽需求 與細心解說
很棒的代理商
|
黃
|
黃夏 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 技師很客氣
但客服回覆速度超慢
工作交接有問題
在狀況外,也一直鬼打牆!
工作效率超爛!不能及時解決問題。
人員訓練有待加強,
收到那麼多負評依然沒有正視人員訓練的問題,
客服的講話邏輯真的很重要!
不是一直道歉就好,需要解決問題好嗎?
Technician is very polite
But the customer service response speed is very slow
Problem with job handover
In addition to the situation, it has been ghosting the wall!
Work efficiency sucks! The problem cannot be solved in time.
Staff training needs to be strengthened.
After receiving so many negative reviews, I still did not face up to the problem of personnel training.
The logic of customer service speech is really important!
Don't you just apologize all the time, you need to fix the problem, okay?
|
Z
|
ZI XUN JIN on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 出個保固GGYY.一直說是人為因素又提不出證明,只說憑經驗,爛,準備申訴去!
講話鬼打牆、前後顛倒不一,又說客戶都不會老實說,從一開始就在質疑客戶,這是什麼神邏輯?
A warranty GGYY. It has always been said that it is due to human factors and no proof can be provided. It only says that it is based on experience, it sucks, and you are ready to appeal!
What kind of divine logic is this when he speaks like a ghost, and the front and back are reversed. He also says that customers will not be honest, and they are questioning customers from the very beginning.
|
C
|
Cynnie Liu on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 從四月中問耗材,到前幾天問洗地機機身霉味的問題,說最晚隔天會回覆,隔天只回覆一句又沒下文,客服超難找,臉書、line官方、電話,沒有一邊幫忙解決問題,花了將近一萬塊,售後服務0,以後再也不會買貴司的商品
From asking about consumables in mid-April, to asking about the musty smell of the washing machine body a few days ago, he said that he would reply the next day at the latest, and he only replied one sentence the next day without a text. Customer service was super hard to find. Facebook, line official, Phone, no one helped solve the problem, it cost nearly 10,000 yuan, after-sales service is 0, and I will never buy your company's products again.
|
C
|
C1 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 貴公司只會整天怪罪客戶使用不當,我們家就買了二台,二台都是相同問題一下哪裡壞一下哪裡壞,皮帶壞了還是人為因素,買了二年換了二條皮帶,當初購買延遲交貨已經讓人傻眼,現在變維護品質有夠差....
Your company will only blame the customer for improper use all day long. Our family bought two sets. Both of them have the same problem. Where is the fault, and the other is bad? The belt is broken or human factors. I bought it for two years and replaced it with two belts. Delayed delivery has made people dumbfounded, and now the quality of maintenance is poor enough....
|
G
|
Gavin Lu on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 今年1月上嘖嘖集資購買雲米26L智慧蒸汽烘烤爐,可承以疫情、物流各種理由延遲發貨,申請退款又以公司規定拖延退款,目前已正式向消基會申訴,消費者若要購買可承國際產品,建議參考他的一星評等,因為那才是最真實的,也可上Mobile01搜尋
In January this year, Shanghai Geeze raised funds to purchase Yunmi 26L Smart Steam Oven, which can delay delivery due to various reasons such as epidemic situation and logistics, and apply for a refund and delay refund according to the company's regulations. If you want to buy Kecheng international products, it is recommended to refer to his one-star rating, because that is the most authentic, you can also search on Mobile01
|
黃
|
黃塔可 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 2022/04/25更新
客服回覆
"說明書的建議都是有經過測試的,再麻煩您洗滌時留意即可"
(但本人不只一次表示:使用都在原廠手冊的規範內)
一直鬼打牆的回覆要消費者照手冊走
而技師說過使用方法卻都非手冊操作方法
專業度不足以撐起代理產品
放棄溝通了,浪費時間!!
-------------------------------------------------------
技術部門專業度不足
客服鬼打牆要消費者跑APP報修流程
無法直接正面回答產品問題
首先,第一點"使用者未正確使用接地"
本人屋舍線路老舊,壁插原就未配有地線
在當時可承國際指派之技師安裝時
"應技師要求提供轉接頭並由技師安裝完成"
請問這是屬於使用者未正確使用,又或者是安裝問題?
是師傅不知道產品禁不起過電流,又或者是知道但卻無視?
第二點"衣物洗滌過量"
整個過程中,本人皆在原廠使用手冊之合理範圍下使用
為何後來甚至提供秤乾衣數據?
只因技師在電話過程中回覆之"乾衣還要算上1:1的吸水率"
所以本人提供之乾衣秤重再加上吸水率遠低於規定的重量
何來申訴回函中"錯誤的認知"之說?
難不成要把衣服吸水後再秤重,還是洗到一半拿出來秤嗎?
相較起目視槽體1/2的粗估
本人提供之數據反而更有說服力
機子要不要修已不是重點
對於曾說可能收費卻矢口不認、技師說法與手冊相悖、回函避重就輕,甚至直指消費者申訴內容並非事實的作法,讓人無法苟同
因收到回函前就已作二次申訴予新北市處理機關
可想而知二次申訴的回函大概又是各說各話
所以請就上述兩點給予直接回覆,以利後續流程
當然,若貴司認為本人論述有誤或不清楚
也歡迎指教
Update 2022/04/25
Customer Service Reply
"The recommendations in the manual have been tested, please pay attention to them when you wash them"
(But I said more than once: the use is within the specifications of the original manual)
The reply that has been ghosting the wall asks consumers to follow the manual
And the technician said how to use it, but it is not a manual operation method
Professionalism is not enough to support agent products
Give up communication, waste time! !
-------------------------------------------------- -----
Lack of expertise in the technical department
The customer service ghost hits the wall and asks consumers to run the APP repair process
Inability to directly answer product questions directly
First of all, the first point "The user is not using the ground correctly"
The wiring in my house is old, and the wall plug is not equipped with a ground wire.
When installed by an internationally-assigned technician at that time
"The adapter is provided upon request by the technician and installed by the technician"
Does this belong to the user not using it correctly, or is it an installation problem?
Is it that the master doesn't know that the product cannot withstand overcurrent, or does he know but ignore it?
The second point is "excessive laundry washing"
During the whole process, I use it within the reasonable scope of the original user manual
Why even provide scale-drying data later?
Just because the technician replied during the phone call that "dry clothes also count the water absorption rate of 1:1"
Therefore, the weight of the dry clothes provided by me plus the water absorption rate is much lower than the specified weight.
How to appeal the "wrong cognition" in the reply letter?
Is it difficult to weigh the clothes after absorbing water, or take them out and weigh them halfway through the wash?
Compared to the rough estimate of 1/2 of the visual tank
The data provided by me is more convincing
Whether the machine needs to be repaired or not is not the point
People can't agree with the practice of saying that there may be charges but denying it, the technician's statement is contrary to the manual, the reply letter is light, and even the content of the consumer's complaint is not factual.
Because before receiving the reply letter, a second appeal was made to the New Taipei City processing agency
It is conceivable that the reply letter of the second appeal is probably different.
So please give a direct reply to the above two points to facilitate the follow-up process
Of course, if your company believes that my statement is wrong or unclear
Advice is also welcome
|
Write some of your reviews for the company 可承國際股份有限公司
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you