臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會

Name: 臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會
Address: 300, Taiwan, Hsinchu City, East District, Ziyou Rd, 10號臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會, Ziyou Rd, Taiwan

2.1/5 ★ 基於 8 評論

Contact 臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會

地址：	300, Taiwan, Hsinchu City, East District, Ziyou Rd, 10號臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會
電話：	📞 +889
網站：	https://www.mvdis.gov.tw/m3-emv-vil/cac/contact/detail%3Farea%3D03
分類：	公司總部企業辦公室 ,
城市：	Ziyou Rd

300, Taiwan, Hsinchu City, East District, Ziyou Rd, 10號臺灣省竹苗區車輛行車事故鑑定委員會

Best Corporate office in Taiwan

阿	阿毛讚 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 負1顆心請全程紀錄，已確保正義，程序符合，自身權利。 Minus 1 heart Please keep a record of the whole process to ensure that justice, procedures are in line and your own rights.
E	Eric on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 這些鑑定人員是肉眼測速，看影片可以說你超速，判斷不出實際速度又講不出誤差值，這是科學鑑定嗎？還是嘴巴鑑定？ These appraisers measure the speed with the naked eye. Watching the movie can say that you are speeding, but you can't judge the actual speed or tell the error value. Is this scientific appraisal? Or mouth identification?
蹦	蹦康. on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 不讓人講話問有沒有異議其他人一直說沒有啦沒有啦中午趕著吃便當？不看地上標線來口頭鑑定還嗆勸你以後都不要騎重機如果我開車現在情況應該反轉摟 Don’t let people talk, ask if there are any objections, other people keep saying no, no, no Hurrying to eat lunch at noon? Do not look at the markings on the ground to give an oral appraisal Still choking, I advise you not to ride a heavy machine in the future If I drive, the situation should be reversed
葉	葉文富 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 花錢鑑定才會被……，個人資料非主動蒐集下查詢難上加難 It is only after spending money on identification that it will be ... , it is even more difficult to search for personal data that is not actively collected.
L	Louie Wei on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 辦公室的大嬸、大叔拜託你們真的不要一直吵！你們嘴巴一直講，不讓我們解釋，這樣很吵你們知道嗎？你們既然知道你們不是委員就不要一直幫我們預設立場跟說明，好嗎？乖乖當個櫃檯角色跟收錢辦事就可以嘍～～～～～～ The aunts and uncles in the office, please don't make noise all the time! You keep talking, don’t let us explain, it’s very noisy, do you know? Since you know that you are not a committee member, don't always help us to preset our position and explain it, okay? Obediently be a counter role and collect money to do things~~~~~~
陳	陳彥宏 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 大家評評理這個單位還有存在的必要嗎？機車駕駛說他已過路口才發現我貨車從左側出來就發生碰撞，那為什麼我貨車前面板金完全沒有碰撞的痕跡，既然他已過路口我才從左側出來，顯然他機車在前我貨車在後，怎麼判定我在支線道的貨車沒有讓幹道的機車先行，這種判決是不是很草率事不關己也不用負責僅提供意見供法院參考，不服的人自己去找法院處理，機車駕駛說謊鑑定單位也迷迷糊糊，有夠專業嗎？為什麼有人還要浪費金錢再去委託學術單位用科學的方法再做鑑定， Is it necessary for everyone to comment on this unit? The driver of the locomotive said that he had crossed the intersection and found out that my truck collided from the left side. Why did my truck have no signs of collision on the front panel? Since he has passed the intersection, I came out from the left side. Obviously his locomotive was in front and my truck was in the back. How do I judge that my truck on the branch road did not allow the locomotive on the main road to go ahead? Is this kind of judgment sloppy and irrelevant, and I don’t have to be responsible. I only provide opinions for the court’s reference. Those who dissatisfied go to the court to deal with it. Also confused, are you professional enough? Why would someone waste money before entrusting an academic unit to use scientific methods to do the appraisal,
余	余子芸 on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 說個笑話理應專業的單位卻引用機車的法條在一台完全使用人力的腳踏車身上。。。還是上坡路段。。。明明自行車有自行車的交通法條，腦袋是怎麼運轉的才覺得可以互用？需要教才分辨的出自行車和機車的差別嗎？原來專業判斷只是在玩文字遊戲，真無言 Tell a joke It should be a professional unit but quoted the law of the locomotive on a pedal car body that uses manpower. . . Still uphill. . . Obviously bicycles have bicycle traffic laws. How does the brain work to realize that they can be used interchangeably? Do I need teaching to distinguish the difference between a bicycle and a motorcycle? It turns out that professional judgment is just playing word games, so speechless
J	Judy Chu on Google ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 小時候，以為做犯法的事就是錯的，長大後，才發現，做犯法的事如果沒有證據，就不是錯的。覺得對世界改觀，非常難過，但也無他法。 When I was young, I thought it was wrong to do something illegal. When I grew up, I realized that it is not wrong to do something illegal if there is no evidence. I feel very sad that the world has changed, but there is no other way.