財團法人成大研究發展基金會 - East District
2.7/5
★
基於 8 評論
?]?Ϊk?H???j??s?o?i????| - Ckhp.ncku.edu.tw
?a?}?G???????x?n???j?Ǹ??@???@?@?q?ܡG(06)2757575??50970-9 2095255
?Τ@?s???G78963987?@?@?@?@?@?@?@?ǯu?G(06)2751164
?q?l????洫?t?γ??N??:XC78963987
?@
Contact 財團法人成大研究發展基金會
地址 : | 701, Taiwan, Tainan City, East District, Dasyue Rd, 1號財團法人成大研究發展基金會 |
電話 : | 📞 +88777 |
網站 : | http://ckhp.ncku.edu.tw/ |
分類: | |
城市 : | Dasyue Rd |
張
|
張哈哈 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 你們裡面是沒人會開車嗎...
Does anyone in you know how to drive...
|
C
|
Chienjr Lin on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 如此的車禍判決,給予一顆星評鑑。
Such a car accident verdict, give a one-star evaluation.
|
周
|
周Joe文雄 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 因為看到報導,關於車禍。5%的車主被撞,觉得贵單位太牛了。
Because I saw the report, about the car accident. 5% of the owners were hit and felt that your unit was too cattle.
|
王
|
王凱申 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 5%肇責是如何算出來的?為何不是8.7%?
How is 5% of the blame calculated? Why not 8.7%?
|
r
|
reee event on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 糊塗教授鑑定 法官直呼太扯 【聯合報╱記者唐秀麗、謝玲玉/連線報導】 2008.08.21 02:55 am
國立成功大學研究發展基金會四年前受託鑑定一件機車死亡車禍,負責鑑定的成大交通管理科學系副教授黃國平錯把肇事的姜俊宇機車刮地痕記載成宋姓死者機車;法官傳喚他出庭發現錯誤,幸未影響判決結果,台南高分院仍維持一審判處姜一年徒刑,減刑為六個月,得易科罰金。
車禍肇事鑑定也可能出錯,承審法官昨天說「太扯了」,傳黃作證,他以太忙為由不來;姜又上訴,致案件延宕四年。姜昨天說:「他是教授耶,怎麼只在法庭上說了聲,『歹勢,這段寫錯了』,就這樣鑑定記錄說改就改。」
成大研究發展基金會執行秘書郭淑苓表示,鑑定人黃國平目前赴大陸參加研討會,事涉專業知識,細節需等黃返國才能了解。
判決書指出,肇事人姜俊宇(廿三歲)於九十三年六月十三日上午十時許騎重機車經嘉義縣大埔鄉省道台三線三百卅九點七公里下坡路段,跨越中央分向限制線駛向南向車道,與騎重機車的宋友倫擦撞,造成宋重傷死亡。
案件先送嘉雲區事故鑑定委員會、再送省行車事故覆議鑑定委員會」鑑定,認為姜的機車刮地痕應是姜造成。法官再送成大鑑定,黃國平報告卻指姜車左側刮痕不是姜造成,與前兩次鑑定不同。二審才出庭的黃說:「我將被告與被害人機車的刮地痕記載顛倒了。」
Apprehensive Professor Appraisal The judge said too much [United Newspaper/Reporter Tang Xiuli, Xie Lingyu/Connected Report] 2008.08.21 02:55 am
The National Cheng Kung University Research and Development Foundation was commissioned to appraise a locomotive death accident four years ago. Associate Professor Huang Guoping of the Department of Traffic Management Science of Chengda University mistakenly recorded Jiang Junyu's scratched locomotive as a locomotive with the surname Song; the judge summoned him to appear in court. It was wrong. Fortunately, it did not affect the verdict. The Tainan High Branch still maintained Jiang’s first-year sentence of one year’s imprisonment.
The appraisal of the car accident may also be wrong. The trial judge said yesterday that it was "too bad" and passed on Huang to testify that he didn't come because he was too busy; Jiang again appealed, delaying the case for four years. Jiang said yesterday: "He is a professor. Why did he just say something in the court, "Dangerous situation, this paragraph is wrong", and just change the identification record."
Guo Shuling, executive secretary of the Chengda Research and Development Foundation, said that appraiser Huang Guoping is currently going to the mainland to attend the seminar, which involves professional knowledge. The details need to be understood after Huang returns to China.
The verdict pointed out that Jiang Junyu (age 23), the perpetrator, was allowed to ride a heavy locomotive through the 30.97 km downhill section of the third line of Provincial Highway 3, Dapu Township, Chiayi County at 10 am on June 13, 1993. The divergence limit line drove towards the southbound lane, and collided with Song Youlun riding a heavy locomotive, causing Song to be seriously injured and killed.
The case was first sent to the Jiayun District Accident Appraisal Committee and then to the Provincial Driving Accident Review and Appraisal Committee. It was believed that Jiang's locomotive scratches should be caused by Jiang. The judge sent the big appraisal again, but Huang Guoping reported that the scratch on the left side of Jiang Che was not caused by Jiang, which was different from the previous two appraisals. Huang, who appeared in court at the second instance, said: "I reversed the scratch marks of the accused and the victim's locomotive."
|
廖
|
廖順順 on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 公路總局屏澎區行車事故鑑定委員會調查後,認為李男闖紅燈是車禍發生的主要原因,因此享有綠燈路權的沒有任何肇責。但此案轉送成大研究發展基金會鑑定後,報告卻逆轉
After investigation, the Pingpeng District Traffic Accident Appraisal Committee of the General Administration of Highways believed that Li Nan's running a red light was the main reason for the accident, so the person who enjoyed the green light right of way was not responsible. However, after the case was transferred to the Chengda Research and Development Foundation for identification, the report was reversed.
|
黃
|
黃小豬(peace is great.) on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 有專業人員的帶領,蠻喜歡的:)
那天是去B1上課,並非每層樓都有廁所!!
但人員皆會細心指引,非常貼心(讚喔!
There is professional leadership, I like it very much :)
I went to class B1 that day, not every floor has toilets! !
But the staff will guide meticulously, very caring (cuckold!
|
k
|
kuma chang on Google
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 女闖紅燈右轉遭直行車輾斃 駕駛因這原因判刑
法院審理時,黃男堅稱他直行經過路口,因賴女紅燈違規右轉,他才會來不及閃避發生碰撞,法院另送請財團法人成大研究發展基金會鑑定,鑑定單位針對雙方車速、距離等,認為黃男行經事故交叉路口時,視線良好,沒有任何遮蔽物,應可看到右前方正違規右轉的賴女,卻疏未注意車前狀況,並隨時採取必要的安全措施,導致發生碰撞,黃男的肇事責任有5%至10%。
撞死闖紅燈右轉的人還得坐三個月的牢?
能不能說說當時雙方車速距離到底多少
The woman ran a red light and turned right and was run over by a straight car. The driver was sentenced for this reason
During the court hearing, Huang Nan insisted that he went straight through the intersection. Because Lai Nv turned right in violation of the red light, he did not have time to dodge the collision. The court also sent a consortium legal person Chengda Research and Development Foundation for identification. The distance, etc., think that when the yellow man passed the accident intersection, he had a good line of sight without any obstructions. He should be able to see the Lai woman who is turning right in violation of the rules on the right front, but he did not pay attention to the situation in front of the car and took necessary safety measures at any time. In the event of a collision, Huang Nan is responsible for 5% to 10% of the accident.
The person who runs the red light and turns right will have to go to jail for three months?
Can you tell me what the speed distance between the two sides was at that time?
|
Write some of your reviews for the company 財團法人成大研究發展基金會
您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息
Recommend a place for you