創意思維設計有限公司 - Lane 162

5/5 基於 8 評論

Contact 創意思維設計有限公司

地址 :

106, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Lane 162, Tonghua St, 5號創意思維設計有限公司1樓

電話 : 📞 +887889
分類:
城市 : Tonghua St

106, Taiwan, Taipei City, Da’an District, Lane 162, Tonghua St, 5號創意思維設計有限公司1樓
孔維琳 on Google

設計好看又專業
Beautiful and professional design
周如淑 on Google

很欣賞這家公司設計的作品
I really appreciate the works designed by this company
張瑋芹 on Google

專業!認真!設計讚!大力推推推?
profession! serious! Great design! Push and push ?
M
Miranda Wu on Google

設計超好看又專業
The design is super nice and professional
S
S S on Google

這間公司設計概念、想法都非常專業!
The design concepts and ideas of this company are very professional!
C
Cynthia TS on Google

???專業!服務讚!設計風格品質1級棒!
???Professional! Great service! Design style quality is great!
W
Wen Cheng Lin on Google

是一家讓人感覺舒適的空間,給人很舒服的感覺,並不會感到壓迫感;但是對於工作品質上其實蠻要求的,壓力確實也蠻大的。我一直以來都是以自己感覺的看法提出來,世界上沒有絕對的客觀,因此提供我個人主觀的感受給看到文章的各位。 環境很乾淨,說白了也像是一個家,偶爾老闆還會請請客,以一個設計公司來說,已經是算很不錯的一家公司。 以在地嚮導的方向來說,我評論的大致狀況感覺是如此,希望看見文章的人能夠透過我文字的內容感覺到此地點的風氣與特色。 稍微回應一些其他評論,我雖不是店家但也有些話想說: 一個人的人生有那麼容易被毀掉嗎?一個人的人生被毀掉的定義是什麼?這些定義太過於模糊,而且世界上沒有任何一個人該對任何一個人負責,文中所提到的似乎想提出什麼問題,但這沒有涉及到谷歌檢舉條例裡面的涉及利益嗎? 假如真有什麼真的語帶諷刺的話語,不應該直接把當場的狀況直接打在上面供人批評嗎?如果只有一句「毀掉」,難道該公司不能反過來說「毀掉」這詞嗎?太過於模糊的評論,只會招來問題。 至少我在這間設計公司所接收到的,是正向的,與該評論是完全不同的感受。又或者該說,一個設計師該有的耐受力,應該要到如何?我並不清楚該評論者想帶給這間公司如何的風向,但隨時歡迎指教此篇我發出的評論。
It is a comfortable space that makes people feel comfortable and does not feel pressured; but the work quality is actually quite demanding, and the pressure is indeed quite high. I have always put forward my own opinions. There is no absolute objectiveness in the world, so I provide my personal subjective feelings to everyone who sees the article. The environment is very clean, and to put it bluntly, it is like a home. Occasionally the boss will treat guests. For a design company, it is already a very good company. In the direction of the local guide, the general situation of my comment feels like this. I hope that people who see the article can feel the atmosphere and characteristics of this place through the content of my text. In response to some other comments, although I am not a store owner, I have something to say: Is a person's life so easily ruined? What is the definition of a person’s life being ruined? These definitions are too vague, and no one person in the world should be responsible to any one person. The article mentioned in the article seems to want to raise some questions, but does it not involve the interests involved in the Google whistleblowing regulations? If there are really ironic words, shouldn't they directly hit the situation on the spot for criticism? If there is only one sentence "destroy", can't the company say "destroy" the other way around? Comments that are too vague will only invite problems. At least what I received from this design company is positive, and it is a completely different feeling from this review. Or should it be said, what is the tolerance that a designer should have? I don’t know what direction the commenter wants to bring to this company, but I’m always welcome to advise me on this comment.
E
Emily Meng-Yu Chang on Google

Super cool!

Write some of your reviews for the company 創意思維設計有限公司

您的評論將非常有助於其他客戶查找和評估信息

評分 *
你的意見 *

(Minimum 30 characters)

你的名字 *

Recommend a place for you